Chavers v. Baldwin et al
| Kevin Chavers |
| Amy Ederty, Stephanie Dorethy, Doug Baldwin and Craig Finelley |
| 1:2019cv02650 |
| April 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Elaine E Bucklo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC Acknowledgement of case transferred to the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS as case 4:19-cv-04102, filed 05/14/2019. (ek, ) |
| Filing 5 TRANSFERRED to the USDC Central District of Illinois, Rock Island Division the electronic record. (bg, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER: For the reasons stated below, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a), this lawsuit is transferred to the Central District of Illinois, Rock Island Division, for imposition of an initial filing fee and whatever other action the transferee court deems appropriate. The Clerk shall effectuate the transfer forthwith. This case and all pending motions are terminated on this Court's docket. Civil case transferred. Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 5/13/2019. Mailed notice. (mgh, )
|
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kevin Chavers for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (bg, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (bg, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and No copies by Kevin Chavers (bg, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
