Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 v. STS Solutions, Inc.
Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 |
STS Solutions, Inc. |
1:2019cv02783 |
April 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Z Lee |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. § 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER on Plaintiffs' motion for relief from Rule 26 stay Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 6/20/19.Mailed notice(ca, ) |
Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Amended motion for relief from stay #16 is granted. Motion for default judgment #14 is stricken as moot. No appearance is required on the motion. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 18 CITATION to Discover Assets issued as to Chase Bank (No Notice)(Third Party). (tt, ) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Motion by Andrew S Pigott for presentment of motion for order #16 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 6/19/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Pigott, Andrew) |
Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 for order (Relief from Rule 62 Stay) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Pigott, Andrew) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion by Andrew S Pigott for presentment of motion for default judgment #14 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 6/19/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Pigott, Andrew) |
Filing 14 MOTION by Plaintiff Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 for default judgment as to Sum Certain (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Order)(Pigott, Andrew) |
Filing 13 ORDER on Plaintiff's motion for default judgment in sum certain Signed by the Honorable John Z. Lee on 5/30/19. Mailed notice(ca, ) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Motion hearing held on 5/28/19. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment in sum certain #10 is granted. Plaintiff should submit a proposed order to the proposed order mailbox and contact the courtroom deputy when he has done so. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by Andrew S Pigott for presentment of motion for default judgment, #10 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 5/28/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Pigott, Andrew) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 for default judgment as to Sum Certain (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Brian Benson, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Andrew S. Pigott)(Pigott, Andrew) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 as to STS Solutions, Inc. on 4/27/2019, answer due 5/20/2019. (Pigott, Andrew) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Pigott, Andrew) |
Filing 7 Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 (Schwartz, Donald) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Initial status hearing set for 6/18/19 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (las, ) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 by Donald D. Schwartz (Schwartz, Donald) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 by Andrew S Pigott (Pigott, Andrew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Pigott, Andrew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15758120.(Pigott, Andrew) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant STS Solutions, Inc. (daj, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 v. STS Solutions, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: STS Solutions, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Pension, Welfare and Vacation Fringe Benefit Funds of IBEW Local 701 | |
Represented By: | Andrew S Pigott |
Represented By: | Donald D. Schwartz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.