Pacheco v. Saul
Thomas Pacheco |
Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul |
1:2019cv02801 |
April 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Rebecca R Pallmeyer |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: No one appear for status hearing on 6/26/2019. Mailed notice. (etv, ) |
Filing 6 CERTIFIED COPY OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Defendant Nancy Berryhill (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit)(Lindland, Kurt) |
Filing 5 DESIGNATION of Kurt N. Lindland as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy Berryhill (Lindland, Kurt) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Initial status hearing set for 6/26/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Parties are encouraged to consent to proceed for all purposes before the Magistrate Judge. Mailed notice. (etv, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Thomas Pacheco by James P. Brown (Brown, James) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Brown, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Thomas Pacheco; (Brown, James) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.