Jones et al v. Deutsche Bank et al
| Francis I. Jones and Duane M. Jones |
| Deutsche Bank, Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC and Quantum Servicing Corporation |
| 1:2019cv02855 |
| April 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Status hearing held on 6/6/2019. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order #8 is denied. Plaintiff needs to properly serve defendants. Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint. Status hearing is set for 7/26/2019 is stricken and reset to 7/22/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Motion hearing held on 5/29/2019. Defendant Deutsche Bank's oral motion for a continuance is granted. Plaintiffs' verified motion for temporary restraining order #8 is entered and continued. Status hearing is set for 6/6/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Motion by Duane M. Jones, Francis I. Jones for presentment of VERIFIED MOTION: temporary restraining order, etc. #8 before Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 5/29/2019 at 08:45 AM. (pk, ) |
| Filing 8 VERIFIED MOTION: temporary restraining order, etc. by Plaintiffs Duane M. Jones, Francis I. Jones (pk, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman and is set for a status hearing on 7/26/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are reminded to review the timelines set out in this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The Court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Deutsche Bank, Quantum Servicing Corporation, Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC (pk, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Duane M. Jones (pk, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (pk, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Duane M. Jones, Francis I. Jones; Jury Demand. (pk, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
