Orzoff v. Saul
| mark orzoff |
| Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul |
| 1:2019cv02891 |
| April 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time until July 15, 2019 to answer #10 is granted. The status hearing set for 7/9/19 is reset to 7/24/19 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, )
|
|
Filing 11
(Agreed) NOTICE of Motion by Kristen Elise Rau for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #10 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 7/9/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Rau, Kristen)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION by Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Agreed) (Rau, Kristen)
|
|
Filing 9
DESIGNATION of Kristen Elise Rau as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy Berryhill (Rau, Kristen)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Case called on 6/18/19. No one appeared. Status hearing set for 7/9/19 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ca, )
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Case called on 5/23/19. No one appeared. Status hearing set for 6/18/19 at 9:00 a.m. The attorney should inform the courtroom deputy by the next status date whether they will consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for all purposes. Mailed notice (ca, )
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Pursuant to Local Rule 4(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(a)(2), the defendant is to file its answer and administrative record by 7/1/19. Plaintiff's opening brief is due 7/29/19. Defendant's response brief is due 8/26/19. Plaintiff's reply brief is due 9/10/19. Ruling by mail. Counsel should note that these dates modify the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Counsel are further directed to meet and confer prior to the date the answer and administrative record are filed to determine whether: (a) the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and (b) an agreed remand order is necessary. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/PUBLIC/Forms/consent.pdf. Status hearing set for 5/23/19 at 9:15 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, )
|
|
Filing 5
PAYMENT of Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15798338. (Brown, James)
|
|
Filing 4
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Plaintiff has not paid the civil case filing fee. Plaintiff is ordered, by May 13, 2019, to pay the initial filing fee of $400 or submit a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff does not do so, this action will be summarily dismissed for want of prosecution.Mailed notice (ca, )
|
|
Filing 3
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff mark orzoff by James P. Brown (Brown, James)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Brown, James)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by mark orzoff; (Brown, James)
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
