Smith v. United Airlines, Inc.,
Plaintiff: William Smith
Defendant: United Airlines, Inc.,
Case Number: 1:2019cv02905
Filed: April 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Z Lee
Nature of Suit: Airplane
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Status hearing held on 7/2/19. The parties are to exchange MIDP disclosures by 7/29/19; initial written discovery requests are to be served by 8/30/19; the deadline to amend the pleadings and join parties is 10/15/19. Fact discovery shall close on 3/31/20. Plaintiff should provide Defendant with a written demand by 8/30/19. Defendant should provide a written response to the demand by 9/20/19. Status hearing set for 10/17/19 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ca, )
July 1, 2019 Filing 23 CERTIFICATE Certification Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (McQuillen, Michael)
July 1, 2019 Filing 22 CERTIFICATE Certification Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Wegman, Paula)
July 1, 2019 Filing 21 CERTIFICATE Certification Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Niemczyk, Christine)
July 1, 2019 Filing 20 CERTIFICATE Certification Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Martin, Matthew)
July 1, 2019 Filing 19 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by United Airlines, Inc., (Martin, Matthew)
June 28, 2019 Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by United Airlines, Inc.,(Martin, Matthew)
June 25, 2019 Filing 17 STATUS Report JOINT INITIAL STATUS REPORT by William Smith (VanOverloop, Melanie)
June 7, 2019 Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant United Airlines, Inc., by Michael Gerard McQuillen (McQuillen, Michael)
June 7, 2019 Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time #11 is granted. The answer or other responsive pleading will be due on or before 6/28/19. No appearance is required on the motion.Mailed notice (ca, )
June 7, 2019 Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant United Airlines, Inc., by Christine Marie Niemczyk (Niemczyk, Christine)
June 7, 2019 Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant United Airlines, Inc., by Matthew David Martin (Martin, Matthew)
June 7, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Paula LoMonaco Wegman for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #11 before Honorable John Z. Lee on 6/18/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Wegman, Paula)
June 7, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION by Defendant United Airlines, Inc., for extension of time to file answer (Wegman, Paula)
June 7, 2019 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant United Airlines, Inc., by Paula LoMonaco Wegman (Wegman, Paula)
May 9, 2019 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (Sims, Matthew)
May 9, 2019 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project (VanOverloop, Melanie)
May 9, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Smith as to United Airlines, Inc., on 5/3/2019, answer due 5/24/2019. (VanOverloop, Melanie)
May 9, 2019 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff William Smith by Matthew S Sims (Sims, Matthew)
May 8, 2019 Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Initial status hearing set for 7/2/19 at 9:15 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, )
May 1, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, )
May 1, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant United Airlines, Inc., (mc, )
April 30, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff William Smith by Melanie Joy VanOverloop (VanOverloop, Melanie)
April 30, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (VanOverloop, Melanie)
April 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by William Smith; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15774452.(VanOverloop, Melanie)
April 30, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. United Airlines, Inc.,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Smith
Represented By: Melanie Joy VanOverloop
Represented By: Matthew S Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Airlines, Inc.,
Represented By: Michael Gerard McQuillen
Represented By: Christine Marie Niemczyk
Represented By: Matthew David Martin
Represented By: Paula LoMonaco Wegman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?