Hunter Killer Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-23
| HUNTER KILLER PRODUCTIONS, INC. |
| DOES 1-23, Doe No. 11 and Doe #5 |
| 1:2019cv02924 |
| May 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Upon receipt of the plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) #19 defendant Doe No. 5 is dismissed from this case. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hunter Killer Productions, Inc. of Doe Defendant No. 5 (Hierl, Michael) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Motion hearing held. Mr. Suit's (Doe No. 7) motion to vacate #14 is denied as moot. The Court advises Mr. Suit of the availability of the services of the Court's Pro Se Assistance Office. The Court notes that Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as to Doe No. 5 #13 incorrectly identifies the Plaintiff in the caption and text; a corrected stipulation should be filed forthwith. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: Upon receipt of the plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) #16 , defendant Doe No. 11 is dismissed from this case. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hunter Killer Productions, Inc. Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Doe Defendant No. 11 (Hierl, Michael) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion for presentment of motion to vacate #14 before Honorable John J. Tharp Jr. on 6/20/2019 at 09:00 AM. (ek, ) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to vacate by Donald Suits. (ek, ) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hunter Killer Productions, Inc. Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Doe Defendant No. 5 (Hierl, Michael) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Doe #5 by Susan Malter Dft: Subscriber at 98.228.220.140 (Malter, Susan) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: For the reasons explained in the Courts order dated 8/24/15 in case number 15 C 5500, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for leave to take early discovery #8 . No appearance on the motion is required. However, Plaintiff may not publish the identity of the Doe defendants in any way without further leave of court. Additionally, within three business days after the information requested in the subpoena is produced, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to provide the person identified by that information with a copy of this order, and a copy of the 8/24/15 order entered in case number 15 C 5500, via overnight delivery. The Doe defendants so identified shall have 30 days from the date he or she receives a copy of the orders to file an objection or other appropriate motion with this Court. The Doe defendants may proceed in this case by pseudonym (based on his or her Doe number or IP address) until further order.Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for discovery #8 before Honorable John J. Tharp Jr. on 5/15/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Hierl, Michael) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM by Hunter Killer Productions, Inc. in support of motion for discovery #8 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(Hierl, Michael) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiff Hunter Killer Productions, Inc. for discovery Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26(f) Conference (Hierl, Michael) |
| Filing 7 MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC (lf, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (lf, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by HUNTER KILLER PRODUCTIONS, INC. Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.7.1 and Local Rule 3.2 (Hierl, Michael) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HUNTER KILLER PRODUCTIONS, INC. by William Benjamin Kalbac (Kalbac, William) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff HUNTER KILLER PRODUCTIONS, INC. by Michael A. Hierl (Hierl, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Hierl, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by HUNTER KILLER PRODUCTIONS, INC.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15776664. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B)(Hierl, Michael) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
