Sudadi et al v. The Boeing Company
| Rukein Binti Sudadi, Naura Azkadina Mahestri, Kanzo Rayyanka Yoghadinata, Rukeni Binti Sudadi and Naushad Kanzo Rayyanka Yoghadinata |
| The Boeing Company |
| 1:2019cv02984 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| P.I.: Airplane Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 REQUEST for Clerk of Court to refund filing fee in the amount of 400.00, receipt no. 0752-15785853, (Larson, Bates) |
Filing 17
ORDER: The Court orders all individual related actions, 19 C 2984, 19 C 2979, 19 C 2980, 19 C 2025, 19 C 2919, 19 C 2240, 19 C 2241, 19 C 2212, 19 C 2213, 19 C 2398, 19 C 2214, 19 C 2400, 19 C 2982, and 19 C 2774 to be consolidated under case number 18 C 7686, to be captioned" I re Lion Air Flight JT 610 Crash." This order will be implemented by the Clerk of Court submitting JS-6 forms to the Administrative Office for the individual related actions. This will designate the individual related actions as closed for administrative and statistical purposes. This order will not be considered a dismissal or disposition of these actions on the merits. All future pleadings are to be filed in the consolidated case alone. No pleadings should be filed in any of the individual related actions which are to be administratively closed. Any additional related cases filed in the future and assigned to Judge Durkin will also be administratively closed and consolidated with this case. Should any party believe at any point in the future that separate proceedings have become necessary for that party's particular claims, the party should make a motion in the consolidated case 18 C 7686 seeking relief. The Clerk is also directed to transfer all attorney appearances in the individual related actions to 18 C 7686. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 5/15/2019. Mailed notice(pk, )
|
| Filing 16 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case reassigned to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin for all further proceedings in accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 40.4 with the case being related to case 18-cv-7686. Honorable John Robert Blakey no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 5/10/2019.(mc, ) |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Naura Azkadina Mahestri, Rukeni Binti Sudadi, Naushad Kanzo Rayyanka Yoghadinata by Jay Edelson (Edelson, Jay) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Naura Azkadina Mahestri, Rukeni Binti Sudadi, Naushad Kanzo Rayyanka Yoghadinata by Benjamin Harris Richman (Richman, Benjamin) |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Naura Azkadina Mahestri, Rukeni Binti Sudadi, Naushad Kanzo Rayyanka Yoghadinata by Ari Jonathan Scharg (Scharg, Ari) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Naura Azkadina Mahestri, Rukeni Binti Sudadi, Naushad Kanzo Rayyanka Yoghadinata by Rafey S. Balabanian (Balabanian, Rafey) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses by The Boeing Company(Larson, Bates) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP Standing Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 6/20/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 6/10/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 9 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (mc, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (mc, ) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Gretchen Marie Paine (Paine, Gretchen) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Mack Harrison Shultz, Jr (Shultz, Mack) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Daniel Thomas Burley (Burley, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by The Boeing Company (Larson, Bates) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Larson, Bates) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Boeing Company by Bates McIntyre Larson (Larson, Bates) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case number (2019 L 002137) filed by The Boeing Company Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15786011. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Larson, Bates) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
