Kruk v. Saul
| Nancy Ann Kruk |
| Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul |
| 1:2019cv03137 |
| May 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sunil R Harjani |
| John Z Lee |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Harjani for all further proceedings. Defendant shall file the administrative record by 7/9/2019. Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision is due by 8/6/2019; Defendant's motion to affirm the decision and her brief in support are due by 9/6/2019; Plaintiff's reply brief is due by 9/17/2019. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week prior to the due date and upon good cause shown. Mailed notice (lxs, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings parties have consented to reassignment. Honorable John Z. Lee no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable John Z. Lee on 5/31/2019.(jh, )
|
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The parties filed a joint consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case will be reassigned. The status hearing set for 6/4/19 is stricken.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 9 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Cooney, Nigel) |
| Filing 8 DESIGNATION of Nigel B Cooney as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill (Cooney, Nigel) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 granted. Pursuant to Local Rule 4(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(a)(2), the defendant is to file its answer and administrative record by 7/9/19. Plaintiff's opening brief is due 8/6/19. Defendant's response brief is due 9/6/19. Plaintiff's reply brief is due 9/17/19. Ruling by mail. Counsel should note that these dates modify the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Counsel are further directed to meet and confer prior to the date the answer and administrative record are filed to determine whether: (a) the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and (b) an agreed remand order is necessary. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/PUBLIC/Forms/consent.pdf. Status hearing set for 6/4/19 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nancy Ann Kruk by Justin Roger Poh (Poh, Justin) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nancy Ann Kruk by Joseph Stephen Sellers (Sellers, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nancy Ann Kruk by Deborah Susan Spector (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Nancy Ann Kruk for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nancy Ann Kruk; (Spector, Deborah) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
