Williams v. Saul
Plaintiff: Robert M. Williams
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv03165
Filed: May 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Thomas M Durkin
Referring Judge: Sunil R Harjani
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani:This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Harjani for all further proceedings. Defendant shall file the administrative record by 7/12/2019. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, Plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the decision is due by 9/10/2019; Defendant's motion to affirm the decision and his brief in support are due by 10/25/2019; Plaintiff's reply brief is due by 11/8/2019. No oversized briefs will be allowed without prior court approval obtained at least one week prior to the due date and upon good cause shown. Mailed notice. (rbf, )
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING Case to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Thomas M. Durkin no longer assigned to the case. Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 6/28/2019. (sxb, )
June 28, 2019 Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Horn, John)
June 27, 2019 Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Ernest Yi Ling as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Ling, Ernest)
May 13, 2019 Filing 6 COMPLAINT filed by Robert M. Williams (pk, )
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. #4 Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 5/13/2019. Mailed notice(pk, )
May 10, 2019 Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Robert M. Williams for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Horn, John)
May 10, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert M. Williams by John E. Horn (Horn, John)
May 10, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Horn, John)
May 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Robert M. Williams; (Horn, John)
May 10, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Represented By: Ernest Yi Ling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert M. Williams
Represented By: John E. Horn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?