Hughes v. Wolfe et al
| Michael T. Hughes |
| Lt. Brown, Unknown Shift Supervisor, Lt. Williams, S. Klimek, Lt. Lewis, Deputy Wolfe, E. Romanev, Tom Dart and S. Fitzpatrick |
| 1:2019cv03174 |
| May 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Lt. Brown, S. Fitzpatrick, S. Klimek, E. Romanev, Deputy Wolfe by Joseph Thomas Murphy (Murphy, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Lt. Brown, S. Fitzpatrick, S. Klimek, E. Romanev, Deputy Wolfe by Danielle Mikhail (Mikhail, Danielle) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by U.S. Marshal Service. Lt. Brown waiver sent on 6/26/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; S. Fitzpatrick waiver sent on 6/26/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; S. Klimek waiver sent on 6/26/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; E. Romanev waiver sent on 6/26/2019, answer due 8/26/2019; Deputy Wolfe waiver sent on 6/26/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. (Attachments: #1 Waiver- Romanev, #2 Waiver- S. Klimek, #3 Waiver- Lt. Brown, #4 Waiver- Deputy Wolfe)(tt, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued, certified copy of order dated 5/31/2019 to the US Marshal's Office for service as to Defendants Lt. Brown, S. Fitzpatrick, S. Klimek, E. Romanev, Deputy Wolfe (las, ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. On 5/21/19, Plaintiff filed a letter in this case, and each of his other cases, asking for an accounting of the filing fees that he still owes. Plaintiff is advised that the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) provides that "if a prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee." 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1). The Seventh Circuit has interpreted this provision of the PLRA to mean that prisoners... always must pay in full. Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 432 (7th Cir. 1997). The requirement that prisoners pay the full filing fee applies even if/when a case has been dismissed, whether voluntarily or involuntarily. Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857, 859 (7th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, Plaintiff still owes the following in filing fees as of the date of this order: Case 19-cv-3282: $350, Case 19-cv-3174: $350, Case 19-cv-2487: $350, Case 19-cv-2457: $350, Case 19-cv-1791: $350, Case 18-cv-6587: $339.75, Case 18-cv-6583: $319.84, Case 18-cv-6139: $328.23, Case 18-cv-6138: $319.84, Case 18-cv-5895: $319.84, Case 18-cv-5582: $319.84. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in each of the above actions, and thus these remaining fees will be collected from his trust fund account using the mechanism found in 28 U.S.C. 1915. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| MAILED copy of order #6 ,five blank USM-285 forms, magistrate judge consent form and filing instructions to Michael T. Hughes. (las, ) |
| E-MAILED order dated 5/31/2019 #6 to Supervisor of the Inmate Trust Fund Accounts at Cook County Jail. (las, ) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT filed by Michael T. Hughes; Jury Demand. (las, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is granted. The trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration is authorized to deduct $12.12 from Plaintiff's account as the initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making deductions in accordance with this order. As explained further below, Plaintiff's trust fund officer must collect 100% of all income into Plaintiff's trust account until accrued filing fees on his multiple cases are paid. The trust fund officers at Cook County Jail are reminded that they must follow all court orders issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 requiring an initial filing fee deduction and the subsequent deductions at 20 percent of the preceding months income credited to the inmate's account for each action pursued. Failure to comply with any court order requiring the trust fund officers to deduct funds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 may result in the issuance of a rule to show cause to determine why the trust fund officers of the Cook County Jail shall not be sanctioned for failure to comply with court orders. The Clerk shall electronically send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at the Cook County Jail. The Clerk of Court is further directed to: (1) file Plaintiff's complaint #1 ; (2) issue summonses for service of the complaint on Defendants Deputy Wolfe, Deputy Romanov, Sgt. S. Klimek, Sgt. S. Fitzpatrick, and Lt. Brown (3) terminate all other Defendants; and (4) send Plaintiff five blank USM-285 service forms, a magistrate judge consent form, filing instructions, and a copy of this order. The Court advises Plaintiff that a completed USM-285 form for each Defendant is required for service. The U.S. Marshal will not attempt service on a Defendant unless and until the required form for that Defendant is received. The U.S. Marshal is appointed to serve Defendants. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #3 is denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 5/31/2019. Mailed notice(las, )
|
| Filing 5 LETTER from Michael Hughes (Envelope postmarked 5/15/2019). (mc, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Michael T. Hughes for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (acm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Plaintiff Michael T. Hughes for attorney representation. (acm) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (acm) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 6 copies by Michael T. Hughes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Envelope Post-Marked 5/6/2019). (acm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
