Fernandez v. Kennedy
| Warden Kennedy and Teri Kennedy |
| Edgar Fernandez |
| 1:2019cv03291 |
| May 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Thomas M Durkin |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: Respondent shall answer or otherwise respond to the habeas corpus petition #1 by August 26, 2019. Petitioner shall reply by October 10, 2019. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 6/25/2019. Mailed notice(jh, )
|
| Filing 4 PAYMENT of Habeas Corpus Filing fee in the amount of $5.00; Receipt No. 4624225711. (jh, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Petitioner is given until July 11, 2019 to either pay the $5 filing fee or file a petition for leave to file in forma pauperis. Petitioner is warned that the Court may dismiss this case if he fails to comply with this order. The Clerk is instructed to (1) update the docket to reflect that Respondent Teri Kennedy, Warden, Pontiac Correctional Center; and, (2) send Petitioner a blank in forma pauperis application form. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 6/11/2019. Mailed notice (nsf, )
|
| MAILED blank in forma pauperis application form to Petitioner. (nsf, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (las, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Edgar Fernandez against Warden Kennedy (las, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
