Roofers' Pension Fund et al v. Amber Leaf Construction Co. Inc. et al
| National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund and Roofers' Pension Fund |
| O.A.K.K. Construction Co Inc. and Amber Leaf Construction Co. Inc. |
| 1:2019cv03315 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status hearing held on 6/27/2019. Defense counsel failed to appear and failed to notify Chambers of any scheduling conflicts. Based upon the representation of Plaintiff's counsel, Defendant's oral motion for an extension of time to file answer is granted and shall be filed on or before 7/19/2019. Status hearing set for 8/7/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 12 STATUS Report Plaintiffs' Initial by Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11 (Blumthal, William) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant O.A.K.K. Construction Co Inc. by James Michael Joyce (Joyce, James) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Amber Leaf Construction Co. Inc. by James Michael Joyce (Joyce, James) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund as to O.A.K.K. Construction Co Inc. on 6/7/2019, answer due 6/28/2019. (Blumthal, William) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund as to Amber Leaf Construction Co. Inc. on 6/7/2019, answer due 6/28/2019. (Blumthal, William) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP Standing Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 6/27/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 6/17/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (aee, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11 by Joseph Edward Mallon (Mallon, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11 by Jeffrey Allen Krol (Krol, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11 by William M. Blumthal, Jr (Blumthal, William) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Blumthal, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by National Roofing Industry Pension Plan, Chicago Roofers' Apprenticeship and Training Fund, United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers Local No. 11, Roofers' Unions Welfare Trust Fund, Roofers' Pension Fund, Roofing Industry Advancement and Research Fund, Roofers' Local 11 Promotional and Organizational Fund; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15834471. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Amber Leaf MOU, #2 Exhibit 2 - 2015-2018 SWA)(Blumthal, William) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kb, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Amber Leaf Construction Co. Inc., O.A.K.K. Construction Co Inc. (ew, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
