Sturdivant v. City of Chicago et al
| Edward Lamont Sturdivant, Sr |
| Chicago Police Headquarters, City of Chicago, Eddie T. Johnson and Sgt. Norway |
| 1:2019cv03423 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILED a copy of order #7 dated 7/9/2019 to the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's current place of incarceration. (ph, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's place of incarceration to deduct $31.42 from Plaintiff's account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initial partial payment of the filing fee and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this order to the trust fund officer at Plaintiff's current place of incarceration. Summonses, however, shall not issue. On the face of Plaintiff's complaint #1 , his claim(s) appear to be untimely. Plaintiff therefore shall, by August 23, 2019, show cause (explain) in writing why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to the statute of limitations as filed after the two-year statute of limitations period passed. Failure to do so by that date will result in dismissal of this case with prejudice as untimely. Ruling on all other motions #4 is deferred until Plaintiff responds. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 7/9/2019. Mailed notice (ph, )
|
| Filing 6 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that 18 CV 4635, Sturdivant v. City of Chicago et al., is currently pending before the Hon. Sharon Johnson Coleman; and It further appearing that the Hon. Virginia M. Kendall is presiding over case 19 CV 3423, Sturdivant v. City of Chicago et al; therefore It is hereby ordered that 19 CV 3423, Sturdivant v. City of Chicago et al., shall be reassigned to Judge Coleman pursuant to Local Rule 40.3(b)(2). Case reassigned to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman for all further proceedings. Honorable Virginia M. Kendall no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 5/30/2019.(pk, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case to the docket of the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman pursuant to Local Rule 40.3(b)(2) (N.D. Ill.). Plaintiff's complaint in this action arises against the same parties and concerns the same subject matter as the complaint Plaintiff submitted in Sturdivant v. City of Chicago, No. 18 C 4635 (N.D. Ill.) (Coleman, J.) (Sturdivant I), which was dismissed without prejudice on October 1, 2018. Indeed, Plaintiff's Statement of Claim in his present complaint is identical to his Statement of Claim in Sturdivant I. This action therefore is subject to direct assignment "to the judge to whom the first case was assigned" under Local Rule 40.3(b)(2). Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 5/22/2019. Mailed notice (jh, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Edward Lamont Sturdivant, Sr for attorney representation. (jh, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Edward Lamont Sturdivant, Sr for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet. (jh, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint by Edward Lamont Sturdivant, Sr. (Exhibits) (jh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
