Villanueva v. NCB Management Services, Inc.
| Jonathan Villanueva |
| NCB Management Services, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv03426 |
| May 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. On the Court's own Motion, Status hearing set for 7/18/2019 is reset for 7/29/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 14 STATUS Report (Joint Initial) by Jonathan Villanueva (Thompson, Bryan) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by NCB Management Services, Inc.(Hussain, Syed) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendant's Motion for extension of time to respond to Complain #9 is granted. Answer shall be filed by 7/9/2019. Motion hearing set for 6/17/2019 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by NCB Management Services, Inc. (Hussain, Syed) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Syed Haseeb Hussain for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 6/17/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Hussain, Syed) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant NCB Management Services, Inc. for extension of time to file answer unopposed (Hussain, Syed) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant NCB Management Services, Inc. by Syed Haseeb Hussain (Hussain, Syed) |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant NCB Management Services, Inc. by Andrew E Cunningham (Cunningham, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 7/18/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 7/15/2019. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jonathan Villanueva as to NCB Management Services, Inc. on 5/28/2019, answer due 6/18/2019. (Thompson, Bryan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant NCB Management Services, Inc. (rc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonathan Villanueva by Robert W. Harrer (Harrer, Robert) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jonathan Villanueva by Bryan Paul Thompson (Thompson, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jonathan Villanueva; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15850762. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Thompson, Bryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Villanueva v. NCB Management Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NCB Management Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Syed Haseeb Hussain |
| Represented By: | Andrew E Cunningham |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jonathan Villanueva | |
| Represented By: | Bryan Paul Thompson |
| Represented By: | Robert W. Harrer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
