Dunlap v. Titan Security Group
| Eva Dunlap |
| Titan Security Group |
| 1:2019cv03451 |
| May 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: A status hearing is set for 7/25/2019 at 9:30 a.m. No later than three business days before the status hearing, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Shah's name and then again on the link entitled 'Initial Status Conferences.' Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Titan Security Group by Laura Dreznes Waller (Waller, Laura) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Titan Security Group by Julie L. Gottshall (Gottshall, Julie) |
| Filing 13 U.S. MARSHAL SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Titan Security Group on 7/9/2019, answer due 7/30/2019. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 12 COMPLAINT filed by Eva Dunlap.(gcy, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #10 is granted. The clerk shall file plaintiff's complaint #1 and issue summons. The U.S. Marshal is appointed to serve defendant, and the clerk shall send a copy of the completed USM-285 form 6 to the Marshal along with the summons for service. Plaintiff's motion for attorney representation #4 is denied. The court will set a status hearing after defendant has been served and will stay defendant's deadline to answer the complaint until after the status hearing. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 6/28/2019. Mailed notice(gcy, )
|
| SUMMONS Issued, Original and certified copy of Order dated 6/28/19 with completed USM-285 form as to Defendant Titan Security Group, to U.S. Marshal for service via email. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Eva Dunlap for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (jjr, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is denied without prejudice. The application is incomplete. Plaintiff failed to answer questions 2, 4.a., 4.f., and 6 through 11. Plaintiff must submit a complete, accurate application before the court will consider granting her in forma pauperis status. Failure to either pay the $400 filing fee or submit a complete IFP application by June 17, 2019, will result in summary dismissal of this case for failure to comply with a court order. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Eva Dunlap. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Eva Dunlap for attorney representation. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Eva Dunlap for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affidavit. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 0 copies by Eva Dunlap. (Attachments). (gcy, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dunlap v. Titan Security Group | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Titan Security Group | |
| Represented By: | Julie L. Gottshall |
| Represented By: | Laura Dreznes Waller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eva Dunlap | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
