Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust v. Central Steel Fabricators, Inc.
Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust |
Central Steel Fabricators, Inc. |
1:2019cv03472 |
May 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Robert M Dow |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Central Steel Fabricators, Inc. by Chad Raymond Degroot (Degroot, Chad) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Status hearing held and continued to 9/5/2019 at 9:00 a.m. to allow parties time to discuss the possibility of settlement. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Central Steel Fabricators, Inc. by William Thomas Daniels (Daniels, William) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Central Steel Fabricators, Inc. by Brian Keith Jackson (Jackson, Brian) |
Filing 9 STATUS Report Joint Initial by Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust (Blumthal, William) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust. Central Steel Fabricators, Inc. waiver sent on 5/23/2019, answer due 7/22/2019. (Blumthal, William) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, ) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr: Initial status hearing is set for 7/10/2019 at 9:00 a.m. and parties are to report the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to get the case ready for trial. Plaintiff is to advise all other parties of the courts action herein. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. The parties are requested to file a joint status report at least two days prior to the initial status. For further details see the Court's website available at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (cdh, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust by Jeffrey Allen Krol (Krol, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust by Joseph Edward Mallon (Mallon, Joseph) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust by William M. Blumthal, Jr (Blumthal, William) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Blumthal, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD filed by Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15858375. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Interim Award (5.9.19), #2 Exhibit 2 - Final Award (5.20.19))(Blumthal, William) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.