Carrasquillo v. Cherry's, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Carrasquillo
Defendant: Cherry's, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv03476
Filed: May 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Edmond E Chang
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2019 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the status report, which says that due to a clerical error service efforts have not begun, the status hearing of 07/02/2019 is reset to 08/08/2019 at 9:15 a.m., with another status report due by 08/05/2019. The parties are strongly encourage to promptly discuss settlement, in light of the allegations and the relief requested. Emailed notice (slb, )
July 1, 2019 Filing 5 STATUS Report Initial Status Report by Michael Carrasquillo (Johnson, Wesley)
July 1, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Cherry's, Inc. (kb, )
May 24, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (smm, )
May 24, 2019 Filing 3 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:Initial status hearing set for 07/02/2019 at 9:15 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, )
May 24, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Johnson, Wesley)
May 24, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ew, )
May 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Carrasquillo; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15859001.(Johnson, Wesley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carrasquillo v. Cherry's, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cherry's, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Carrasquillo
Represented By: Wesley E. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?