Forsyth v. Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc.
Plaintiff: Michael Forsyth
Defendant: Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv03793
Filed: June 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: John Robert Blakey
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2019 Filing 19 NOTICE by Ryan Frederick Moore of Change of Address (Attachments: #1 Supplement List of Active Cases)(Moore, Ryan)
August 1, 2019 Filing 18 MEMORANDUM by Michael Forsyth in Opposition to motion to dismiss #10 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Loftus, Alexander)
July 11, 2019 Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Motion hearing held on 7/11/2019. Defendant's motion to dismiss #10 is briefed as follows: response shall be filed on or before 8/1/2019; reply shall be filed on or before 8/15/2019; motion hearing set for 9/11/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, )
July 8, 2019 Filing 16 STATUS Report Joint by Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. (Andrichik, William)
July 2, 2019 Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. by Patricia B. Palacios (Palacios, Patricia)
July 2, 2019 Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant's motion for pro hac vice #9 is granted. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion to dismiss #10 . Plaintiff is advised to review the Courts standing order on Motions to Dismiss, which is available on the Courts homepage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. The Court's Order requires Plaintiff to make an election as to whether he/she will amend the complaint or stand on the current complaint and proceed with briefing on the motion to dismiss. Defendant's motion to dismiss #10 is set for 7/11/2019. Plaintiff shall be prepared to make an election regarding Defendant's motion to dismiss at the next hearing. Initial status hearing previously set for 7/18/2019 is stricken. Initial status report deadline to stand. Mailed notice (gel, )
July 1, 2019 Filing 13 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. (Andrichik, William)
July 1, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by William Robert Andrichik for presentment of motion to dismiss #10 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 7/11/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Andrichik, William)
July 1, 2019 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. in support of motion to dismiss #10 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Andrichik, William)
July 1, 2019 Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. to dismiss Complaint (Andrichik, William)
July 1, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc.For Pro Hac Vice for Patti Palacios receipt # 0752-15987171 (Palacios, Patricia)
July 1, 2019 Filing 8 PAYMENT by Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. of Pro Hac Fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15987171. (Palacios, Patricia)
July 1, 2019 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. by William Robert Andrichik (Andrichik, William)
June 17, 2019 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP Standing Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 7/18/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 7/8/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, )
June 10, 2019 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Forsyth as to Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. on 6/10/2019, answer due 7/1/2019. (Loftus, Alexander)
June 7, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Correction regarding complaint #1 . (smm, )
June 7, 2019 Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Forsyth; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15906363. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Loftus, Alexander)
June 7, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Loftus, Alexander)
June 7, 2019 Filing 1 ENTERED in Error. (Loftus, Alexander) Modified on 6/7/2019 (smm, ).
June 7, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Adtalem Global Education, Inc. (ew, )
June 7, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Forsyth v. Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc.
Represented By: William Robert Andrichik
Represented By: Patricia B. Palacios
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Forsyth
Represented By: Alexander Nicholas Loftus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?