Forsyth v. Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc.
Michael Forsyth |
Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. |
1:2019cv03793 |
June 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
John Robert Blakey |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE by Ryan Frederick Moore of Change of Address (Attachments: #1 Supplement List of Active Cases)(Moore, Ryan) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM by Michael Forsyth in Opposition to motion to dismiss #10 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Loftus, Alexander) |
Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Motion hearing held on 7/11/2019. Defendant's motion to dismiss #10 is briefed as follows: response shall be filed on or before 8/1/2019; reply shall be filed on or before 8/15/2019; motion hearing set for 9/11/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 16 STATUS Report Joint by Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. (Andrichik, William) |
Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. by Patricia B. Palacios (Palacios, Patricia) |
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant's motion for pro hac vice #9 is granted. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion to dismiss #10 . Plaintiff is advised to review the Courts standing order on Motions to Dismiss, which is available on the Courts homepage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. The Court's Order requires Plaintiff to make an election as to whether he/she will amend the complaint or stand on the current complaint and proceed with briefing on the motion to dismiss. Defendant's motion to dismiss #10 is set for 7/11/2019. Plaintiff shall be prepared to make an election regarding Defendant's motion to dismiss at the next hearing. Initial status hearing previously set for 7/18/2019 is stricken. Initial status report deadline to stand. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 13 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. (Andrichik, William) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by William Robert Andrichik for presentment of motion to dismiss #10 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 7/11/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Andrichik, William) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM by Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. in support of motion to dismiss #10 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Andrichik, William) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Defendant Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. to dismiss Complaint (Andrichik, William) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc.For Pro Hac Vice for Patti Palacios receipt # 0752-15987171 (Palacios, Patricia) |
Filing 8 PAYMENT by Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. of Pro Hac Fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-15987171. (Palacios, Patricia) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. by William Robert Andrichik (Andrichik, William) |
Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP Standing Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 7/18/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 7/8/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Forsyth as to Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. on 6/10/2019, answer due 7/1/2019. (Loftus, Alexander) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Correction regarding complaint #1 . (smm, ) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Forsyth; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15906363. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Loftus, Alexander) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Loftus, Alexander) |
Filing 1 ENTERED in Error. (Loftus, Alexander) Modified on 6/7/2019 (smm, ). |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Adtalem Global Education, Inc. (ew, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Forsyth v. Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Adtalem Global Education, Inc. f/k/a Devry, Inc. | |
Represented By: | William Robert Andrichik |
Represented By: | Patricia B. Palacios |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Forsyth | |
Represented By: | Alexander Nicholas Loftus |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.