Scapa North America, Inc. v. Hall et al
| Scapa North America, Inc. |
| David Hall and Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2019cv03828 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Manish S Shah |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 66 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Pursuant to the stipulation of dismissal #65 , this case is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Civil case terminated. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 65 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 63 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The status hearing on 4/15/20 is stricken and no appearance is necessary. The parties shall file a status report by 4/15/20 with an update on finalizing settlement (or a stipulation of dismissal). Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
Filing 64
ORDER Seconded Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 30, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Second Amended General Order. Amended General Order 20-0012, entered on March 17, 2020, and General Order 20-0014, entered on March 20, 2020, are vacated and superseded by this Second Amended General. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/30/2020: Mailed notice. (docket5, )
|
|
Filing 62
ORDER Amended General Order 20-0012 IN RE: CORONAVIRUS COVID-19 PUBLIC EMERGENCY Signed by the Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on March 16, 2020. All open cases are impacted by this Amended General Order. See attached Order for guidance.Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/16/2020: Mailed notice. (td, )
|
| Filing 61 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Status hearing held. The parties report they have reached a settlement. The motion for preliminary injunction #13 is terminated as moot, without prejudice. Continued status hearing is set for 4/15/20 at 9:30 a.m. If a stipulation of dismissal is submitted in advance of that date, then no appearance is necessary. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 60 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Motion hearing held. The motion to place filings under seal #59 is granted. Defendant's motion for protective order #54 #55 is granted in part and denied in part. The court will not limit the list of customers plaintiff may inquire about. But the inquiry should be limited to exploring what role Mr. Hall played in any relationship with that customer. The court is not authorizing any inquiry into revenue information at this time. Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. may designate parts of the deposition as "attorneys' eyes only," temporarily. No fees shall be awarded in connection with this motion. Continued status hearing remains set for 3/6/20 at 9:30 a.m. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 59 MOTION by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. to seal document MOTION by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. for protective order #55 , MOTION by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. for protective order #54 , other, #53 (Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 58 REPLY by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. to motion for protective order #55 , notice of motion #56 , response in opposition to motion, #57 (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 57 RESPONSE by Scapa North America, Inc.in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. for protective order #54 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - January 16, 2020 email, #2 Exhibit B - January 17, 2020 email, #3 Exhibit C - January 20, 2020 email, #4 Exhibit D - January 21, 2020 email, #5 Exhibit E - January 22, 2020 email)(Mason, Lawrence) Modified on 1/28/2020 (las, ). |
| Filing 56 NOTICE of Motion by Elleni Kalouris for presentment of motion for protective order #54 , motion for protective order #55 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 1/30/2020 at 09:45 AM. (Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 55 MOTION by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. for protective order (Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 54 MOTION by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. for protective order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 53 Motion for Protective Order by Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit A Discovery Response, #3 Exhibit B MIDP, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit F, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit E)(Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 52 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Status hearing held. The fact discovery deadline is extended to 2/28/20 for the purposes of completing outstanding written discovery and depositions. No new written discovery may be issued. Continued status hearing is set for 3/6/20 at 9:30 a.m. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 51 NOTICE by Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. Certificate of Service (Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 50 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Status hearing held and continued to 1/10/20 at 9:30 a.m. The 1/31/20 fact discovery deadline remains as set. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 49 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Status hearingheld. The 1/31/20 fact discovery deadline remains as set. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction #13 remains entered and continued. Continued status hearing is set for 12/3/19 at 9:30 a.m. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 48 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE Order. Signed by the Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/27/2019. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 47 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Status hearing held. All fact discovery must be noticed in time to be completed by 1/31/20. Continued status hearing is set for 10/29/19 at 9:30 a.m. The parties may contact susan_mcclintic@ilnd.uscourts.gov for a settlement referral. Enter Stipulated Protective Order. The stipulated protective order does not, by itself, authorize the filing of any document under seal, and a party or interested member of the public has a right to challenge the sealing of documents. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 46 CERTIFICATE of Service of Defendants' Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses by Brian David Burbrink on behalf of David Hall (Burbrink, Brian) |
| Filing 45 CERTIFICATE of Service [of Plaintiff's Mandatory Initial Discovery Responses] by Lawrence David Mason on behalf of Scapa North America, Inc. (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 44 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Status hearing held. For the reasons stated in open court, the motions to dismiss #27 #29 are denied. Defendant ACTS's motion to adopt co-defendant's motions #31 is granted. Discovery under the MIDP shall be exchanged by 9/26/19. Continued status hearing is set for 9/27/19 at 9:30 a.m. The parties may contact susan_mcclintic@ilnd.uscourts.gov to adjust that date, or to request a settlement referral. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 43 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by David Hall(Drake, John) |
| Filing 42 ADHESIVE COATING TECHNOLOGIES ANSWER to Complaint by Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc.(Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 41 REPLY by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. to motion to dismiss #29 (Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 40 REPLY by Defendant David Hall to motion to dismiss #27 (Drake, John) |
| Filing 39 CERTIFICATE of Service [re Plaintiff's Responses to Defendants' First Set of Discovery Requests] by Lawrence David Mason on behalf of Scapa North America, Inc. (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 38 CERTIFICATE of Service for Response to First Set of Interrogatories and Response to First Request for Production of Documents by Elleni Kalouris on behalf of Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. (Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 37 RESPONSE by Scapa North America, Inc.in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. to dismiss Count III, IV, and VI #29 (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 36 RESPONSE by Scapa North America, Inc.in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant David Hall to dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint #27 (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 35 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion to withdraw #33 is granted. John Lee is terminated as counsel of record. No appearance on the motion is necessary. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE of Motion by Lawrence David Mason for presentment of motion to withdraw #33 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 7/31/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 33 MOTION by Plaintiff Scapa North America, Inc. to withdraw attorney (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 32 CERTIFICATE of Service Defendant ACT response to Plaintiff's Request to Admit by Elleni Kalouris on behalf of Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. (Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 31 MOTION by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc.To Adopt AND CONFORM APPLICABLE MOTIONS OF CO-DEFENDANT DAVID HALL (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 30 MEMORANDUM of ACT in Support of Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Declaration of P. Poulos, #2 Certificate of Service)(Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 29 MOTION by Defendant Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. to dismiss Count III, IV, and VI (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 28 MEMORANDUM by David Hall in support of motion to dismiss #27 Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of David Hall, #2 Exhibit B - Second Declaration of David Hall, #3 Exhibit C - Table of IL Federal and State Court Decisions)(Burbrink, Brian) |
| Filing 27 MOTION by Defendant David Hall to dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint (Burbrink, Brian) |
| Filing 26 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for extension of time to answer #22 is granted, and defendants must answer the complaint by 8/23/19. The motion for expedited discovery #24 is granted. No appearance on 7/16/19 is necessary. Status hearing remains set for 8/27/19 at 9:30 a.m. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Motion by John A Drake for presentment of motion for discovery #24 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 7/16/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Drake, John) |
| Filing 24 MOTION by Defendants Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc., David Hall for discovery - Expedited (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Defendants' First Set of Discovery Requests to Plaintiff)(Drake, John) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Motion by John A Drake for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #22 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 7/16/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Drake, John) |
| Filing 22 MOTION by Defendants Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc., David Hall for extension of time to file answer (Drake, John) |
| Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of Service [re: first set of written discovery to Defendants] by Lawrence David Mason on behalf of Scapa North America, Inc. (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Motion hearing held. Defendants' responsive motions to dismiss are due 7/15/19. No notices of presentment are necessary. Plaintiff's response is due 8/5/19; defendants' replies 8/19/19. For the reasons stated in open court, plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery #7 is granted in part. Plaintiff is authorized to issue written discovery. Responses to discovery shall be made within 30 days. No oral discovery is authorized at this time. An agreed proposed protective order may be submitted to proposed_order_shah@ilnd.uscourts.gov. The motion for preliminary injunction #13 is entered and continued to the status hearing which is set for 8/27/19 at 9:30 a.m. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 19 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant David Hall by John A Drake (Drake, John) |
| Filing 18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant David Hall by Brian David Burbrink (Burbrink, Brian) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc., David Hall by Elleni Kalouris (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Kalouris, Elleni) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Motion hearing held. Hearing on plaintiff's motion for discovery #7 is entered and continued to 6/25/19 at 9:45 a.m. to coincide with the hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction #13 . Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion by Lawrence David Mason for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction #13 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 6/25/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM by Scapa North America, Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction #13 (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 13 MOTION by Plaintiff Scapa North America, Inc. for preliminary injunction (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Text of Proposed Order)(Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scapa North America, Inc. as to David Hall on 6/15/2019, answer due 7/8/2019. (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scapa North America, Inc. as to Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc. on 6/14/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Scapa North America, Inc. by John A Lee (Lee, John) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for leave to file oversized brief #5 is granted. Notices mailed. (psm, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion by Lawrence David Mason for presentment of motion for discovery #7 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 6/18/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Scapa North America, Inc. for discovery [limited, expedited] and to preserve evidence (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion by Lawrence David Mason for presentment of motion for leave to file #5 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 6/18/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Scapa North America, Inc. for leave to file overlength brief (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ek, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Scapa North America, Inc. (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Scapa North America, Inc. by Lawrence David Mason (Mason, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER RELIEF filed by Scapa North America, Inc.; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15907363. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Non-Compete Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Cease and Desist Letters, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mason, Lawrence) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Adhesive Coating Technologies, Inc., David Hall (jjr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
