Witek v. Saul
Plaintiff: Joseph Witek
Defendant: Andrew Saul and Andrew Marshall Saul
Case Number: 1:2019cv03862
Filed: June 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Sara L Ellis
Referring Judge: M David Weisman
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2019 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable M. David Weisman: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Weisman. Parties shall comply with the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Mailed notice (ao,)
July 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING: Case reassigned to the Honorable M. David Weisman, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Honorable Sara L. Ellis no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 7/23/2019. (bg, )
July 22, 2019 Filing 9 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Spector, Deborah)
July 19, 2019 Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Heffron, Scott)
July 19, 2019 Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Scott Dennis Heffron as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Heffron, Scott)
June 17, 2019 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 8/1/2019 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 7/25/2019. Mailed notice (rj, )
June 10, 2019 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Joseph Witek by Justin Roger Poh (Poh, Justin)
June 10, 2019 Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Joseph Witek by Joseph Stephen Sellers (Sellers, Joseph)
June 10, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Joseph Witek by Deborah Susan Spector (Spector, Deborah)
June 10, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Spector, Deborah)
June 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joseph Witek; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15912212.(Spector, Deborah)
June 10, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Witek v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Marshall Saul
Represented By: Scott Dennis Heffron
Represented By: AUSA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Witek
Represented By: Joseph Stephen Sellers
Represented By: Justin Roger Poh
Represented By: Deborah Susan Spector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?