Boyd v. DuPage Habitat for Humanity
Susan Boyd |
DuPage Habitat for Humanity |
1:2019cv03917 |
June 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin:Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to 9/9/2019 to answer or otherwise plead #7 is granted. Joint status report is to be filed by by 9/19/2019. Status hearing set for 9/23/2019 at 09:00 AM. No appearance is required on 8/5/2019. Mailed notice (srn, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion by Kimberly Anne Ross for presentment of extension of time #7 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/5/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Ross, Kimberly) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant DuPage Habitat for Humanity for extension of time Agreed (Ross, Kimberly) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant DuPage Habitat for Humanity by Kimberly Anne Ross (Ross, Kimberly) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant DuPage Habitat for Humanity by Becky Lynn Kalas (Kalas, Becky) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (tt, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant DuPage Habitat for Humanity (pj, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Susan Boyd by Michael T. Smith (Smith, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Susan Boyd; Y. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15918196. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Smith, Michael) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boyd v. DuPage Habitat for Humanity | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Susan Boyd | |
Represented By: | Michael T. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DuPage Habitat for Humanity | |
Represented By: | Becky Lynn Kalas |
Represented By: | Kimberly Anne Ross |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.