Jackson v. United States of America
Judia Jackson |
United States of America |
1:2019cv04016 |
June 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sara L Ellis |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 STATUS Report Initial by Judia Jackson (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Peters, Randall) |
Filing 8 DESIGNATION of Sarah J. North as U.S. Attorney for Defendant United States of America (North, Sarah) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Initial status hearing set for 8/6/2019 is stricken and reset to 9/5/2019 at 1:30 p.m. Mailed notice (mw, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (ec, ) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted by Judia Jackson as to Judia Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Peters, Randall) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ek, ) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 8/6/2019 at 9:30AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 7/30/2019. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Judia Jackson by Randall F. Peters (Peters, Randall) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Peters, Randall) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Judia Jackson; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15931989. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Group A, #2 Exhibit B)(Peters, Randall) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (daj, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jackson v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Judia Jackson | |
Represented By: | Randall F. Peters |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States of America | |
Represented By: | AUSA - Chicago |
Represented By: | Sarah J. North |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.