Murphy v. Dealer E Process, LLC
| Rhonda Murphy |
| Dealer E Process, LLC |
| 1:2019cv04034 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Dealer E Process, LLC re answer to complaint #9 (Berger, Adam) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Dealer E Process, LLC (Berger, Adam) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE Certificate of Mailing Amended FRPC 26(a)(1) Disclosures (Berger, Adam) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Rule 16(b) status hearing held on 8/8/2019 with attorneys for both sides. Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures are to be made by 8/27/2019. Status hearing is continued to 9/11/2019 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice. (pjg, ) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service Notice of Mailing Initial Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures by Adam M. Berger on behalf of Dealer E Process, LLC (Berger, Adam) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Dealer E Process, LLC by Adam M. Berger (Berger, Adam) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Initial status hearing is set to 9:00 a.m. on 8/8/2019 before Judge Kennelly, in Chambers, Room 2188. Parties are to review and comply with Judge Kennelly's standing initial order, which may be found on his web page, located at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_JUDGES/KENNELLY/INIT-ORD.htm. Counsel for plaintiff(s) are ordered to cause a copy of this order to be delivered forthwith to each defendant who has not yet appeared by counsel in the same manner that summons has been or is being served on each defendant. (mk) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Rhonda Murphy. Dealer E Process, LLC waiver sent on 6/28/2019, answer due 8/27/2019. (Martoccio, Gary) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Dealer E Process, LLC. (lw, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Rhonda Murphy by Gary James Martoccio (Martoccio, Gary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rhonda Murphy; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15934477. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martoccio, Gary) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (kb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Murphy v. Dealer E Process, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dealer E Process, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Adam M. Berger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rhonda Murphy | |
| Represented By: | Gary James Martoccio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
