Noel v. Saul
| Juanona Noel |
| Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Marshall Saul |
| 1:2019cv04110 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Jeffrey Cummings |
| John Z Lee |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings: This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cummings. Defendant shall file the administrative record by 8/30/19. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.4, plaintiff's brief in support of reversing or remanding the Commissioner's decision is due by 10/30/19. Defendant's response shall be filed by 12/16/19. Plaintiff's reply in support shall be filed by 1/3/20. The Court will issue a ruling by mail. Mailed notice. Mailed notice (rbf, ) |
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings, pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(C) for all further proceedings, parties having consented to the reassignment. Signed by Honorable John Z. Lee on 7/15/19. (aee, )
|
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:The parties filed a joint consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case will be reassigned. The status hearing set for 7/16/19 is stricken.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 10 JOINT CONSENT to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (Arce, Jimmy) |
| Filing 9 DESIGNATION of Jimmy Lorenzo Arce as U.S. Attorney for Defendant Andrew Marshall Saul (Arce, Jimmy) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT filed by Juanona Noel. (aee, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee: Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #3 granted. Pursuant to Local Rule 4(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(a)(2), the defendant is to file its answer and administrative record no later than 8/19/19. Plaintiff's opening brief is due 9/16/19. Defendant's response brief is due 10/14/19. Plaintiff's reply brief is due 10/28/19. Ruling by mail. Counsel should note that these dates modify the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 16.4. Counsel are further directed to meet and confer prior to the date the answer and administrative record are filed to determine whether: (a) the parties will agree to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge and (b) an agreed remand order is necessary. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, the appropriate form to execute and file with the court may be found at the following location: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/PUBLIC/Forms/consent.pdf. Status hearing set for 7/16/19 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juanona Noel by Justin Roger Poh (Poh, Justin) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juanona Noel by Joseph Stephen Sellers (Sellers, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Juanona Noel by Deborah Susan Spector (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Juanona Noel for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Spector, Deborah) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED COMPLAINT filed by Juanona Noel; (Spector, Deborah) Modified on 6/20/2019 (aee, ). |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cummings. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ecw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
