Perez v. Union Pacific Railorad Co.
Plaintiff: Aldo Perez
Defendant: Union Pacific Railorad Co.
Case Number: 1:2019cv04135
Filed: June 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Gabriel A Fuentes
Referring Judge: John J Tharp
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The matter has been referred to this Court for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery scheduling and supervision, and any settlement conference (doc. #15 ). The matter is set for an initial status hearing before Magistrate Judge Fuentes on 8/22/19 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom #1838. Mailed notice. (jj, )
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery scheduling and supervision and any settlement conference.(air, )Mailed notice.
August 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:Status hearing held. Defendant's oral motion for a (7) day extension for the exchange of initial disclosures is granted. Parties may move forward with discovery once they have complied with their initial production requirements under the MIDP program. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Fuentes for all further discovery scheduling and supervision; the referral will also include the authority to conduct a settlement conference as necessary. Mailed notice (air, )
August 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Plaintiff Aldo Perez. (Bishof, John)
August 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STATUS Report Joint Initial Status Report by Aldo Perez (Bishof, John)
July 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Union Pacific Railorad Co.(Dawson, Brody)
July 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr: This case is set for an initial status conference on 8/15/19 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to review the procedures for initial status conferences, located at [https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?79eF+7uiX7ewBj/ITKrjoA==], and to submit the required initial status report no later than 8/8/19. Mailed notice (air, )
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Union Pacific Railorad Co. Disclosure Statement (Dawson, Brody)
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Union Pacific Railorad Co. by Thomas A. P. Hayden (Hayden, Thomas)
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Union Pacific Railorad Co. by Sarah-Joel Martine Privert (Privert, Sarah-Joel)
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Union Pacific Railorad Co. by Brody Elizabeth Dawson (Dawson, Brody)
June 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (tt, )
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Aldo Perez by Patricia N. Gerberich (Gerberich, Patricia)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Aldo Perez by John S. Bishof, Jr (Bishof, John)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Bishof, John)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Aldo Perez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-15948460.(Bishof, John)
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Union Pacific Railorad Co. (ec, )
June 20, 2019 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lma, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. Union Pacific Railorad Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aldo Perez
Represented By: Patricia N. Gerberich
Represented By: John S. Bishof, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railorad Co.
Represented By: Thomas A. P. Hayden
Represented By: Brody Elizabeth Dawson
Represented By: Sarah-Joel Martine Privert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?