Webb v. AFSCME Council 31, Local 654 et al
Derek Webb |
AFSCME Council 31, Gina Mack, AFSCME Local 654, Eugene Boatright, AFSCME Council 31, Local 654, Tom Edstrom, James Jackson and Roberta Lynch |
1:2019cv04192 |
June 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sharon Johnson Coleman |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Derek Webb as to Roberta Lynch on 8/8/2019, answer due 8/29/2019. (las, ) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Derek Webb as to AFSCME Council 31 on 8/8/2019, answer due 8/29/2019. (las, ) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Derek Webb as to James Jackson on 8/8/2019, answer due 8/29/2019. (las, ) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Derek Webb as to Gina Mack on 8/8/2019, answer due 8/29/2019. (las, ) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Derek Webb as to Eugene Boatright on 8/8/2019, answer due 8/29/2019. (las, ) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Derek Webb as to Tom Edstrom on 8/8/2019, answer due 8/29/2019. (las, ) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Eugene Boatright, Tom Edstrom, James Jackson, Roberta Lynch, Gina Mack by Robert A. Seltzer (Seltzer, Robert) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants AFSCME Council 31, Local 654, Eugene Boatright, Tom Edstrom, James Jackson, Roberta Lynch, Gina Mack. (ec, ) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants AFSCME Council 31, AFSCME Local 654 by Michael Shea Young (Young, Michael) |
Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman and is set for a status hearing on 8/23/2019 at 9:00 AM. The parties are reminded to review the timelines set out in this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project. The parties are directed to meet and discuss the status of the case. The parties are to file a joint status report in the format described on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov at least 3 business days prior to the status. The parties are directed to discuss settlement, and whether they consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. The Court encourages the parties to review this court's website for its standing orders prior to contacting chambers. Mailed notice. (ym, ) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants AFSCME Council 31, AFSCME Local 654 by Robert A. Seltzer (Seltzer, Robert) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (las, ) |
Filing 4 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Derek Webb (las, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (las, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Derek Webb; Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 exhibits)(las, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.