McGahee v. C.T.A.
| Kenneth McGahee |
| C.T.A. |
| 1:2019cv04574 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Gary Feinerman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ENTERED JUDGMENT on 8/27/2019.Mailed notice.(jlj, ) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #12 is denied. Despite being alerted twice to the court's concern regarding the veracity of the financial information he provided and asked twice to provide further explanation #9 #11 , Plaintiff failed to do so. Accordingly, this case is dismissed. Enter judgment order. Motion for attorney representation #5 is denied as moot. The status hearing set for 9/9/2019 #11 is stricken. Civil case closed. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION and Financial Affidavit by Plaintiff Kenneth McGahee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (smm, ) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #10 is denied without prejudice. The renewed in forma pauperis application does not give complete answers to Questions 2.A and 4G. In addition, in light of Plaintiff's representation (Doc. 4 at 1) that he was employed by CTA through May 2019 (and perhaps that he was paid through December 2018), the court has doubts as to whether Plaintiff's answer to Question 4.A is correct. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, he must by 8/28/2019 file a renewed in forma pauperis application that gives complete answers to Questions 2.A and 4.G; in addition, if Plaintiff continues to represent in his answer to Question 4.A that he earned no salary or wages in the last twelve months other than from his new employment at SCR, he must explain how he received no wages over the last twelve months despite his being employed by CTA through May 2019. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, this case will be dismissed. The status hearing set for 8/13/2019 #9 is stricken and re-set for 9/9/2019 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kenneth McGahee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (sxb, ) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #4 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has until 7/30/2019 to file a renewed in forma pauperis application. If Plaintiff does so, he must provide a complete answer to Question 2.B. In addition, he must provide an accurate answer to Questions 4.A, 4.F, and 4.G. Because Plaintiff says he was employed through mid-May 2019, it is doubtful that he received less than $200 in salary over the last twelve months. If Plaintiff fails to file a renewed in forma pauperis application, this case will be summarily dismissed. Status hearing set for 8/13/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice. (jlj, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (sxb, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION by Plaintiff Kenneth McGahee for attorney representation (sxb, ) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION by Plaintiff Kenneth McGahee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (sxb, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Kenneth McGahee (sxb, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (sxb, ) |
| Filing 1 RECEIVED Complaint and 1 copy by Kenneth McGahee (sxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McGahee v. C.T.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: C.T.A. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kenneth McGahee | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
