Ramirez vs. G4S Security Solutions (USA), Inc.
Plaintiff: Mr. Richard ramirez, G4S Security Solutions (USA), Inc. and Richard Ramirez
Case Number: 1:2019cv04596
Filed: July 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Robert W Gettleman
Referring Judge: Martha M Pacold
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2019 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Status hearing set before Judge Gettleman on 9/18/2019 is stricken. Mailed notice (cn).
August 23, 2019 Filing 10 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: GENERAL ORDER 19-0025 Pursuant that to the Executive Committee Order entered on August 9, 2019 the civil cases on the attached list have been selected for reassignment to form the initial calendar of the Honorable Martha M. Pacold; therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the attached list of 342 cases be reassigned to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties affected by this Order must review the Honorable Martha M. Pacolds webpage on the Courts website for the purpose of reviewing instructions regarding scheduling and case management procedures; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any civil case that has been reassigned pursuant to this Order will not be randomly reassigned to create the initial calendar of a new district judge for twelve months from the date of this Order; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable Martha M. Pacold to the Courts civil case assignment system during the next business day, so that she shall receive a full share of such cases; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable Martha M. Pacold to the Courts criminal case assignment system thirty days from the entry of this Order so that she shall receive a full share of such cases. Case reassigned to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold for all further proceedings. Honorable Robert W. Gettleman no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 8/23/2019.(aee, )
August 14, 2019 Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Motion hearing held on 8/14/2019. For the reasons stated on the record, G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.'s motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint #5 is denied. Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by 9/11/2019. Status hearing set for 9/18/2019 at 9:10 a.m. Mailed notice (cn).
August 6, 2019 Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant G4S Security Solutions (USA), Inc. by Anna S. Morrissey (Morrissey, Anna)
August 5, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion by Kelly Elisabeth Eisenlohr-Moul for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #5 before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 8/14/2019 at 09:15 AM. (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
August 1, 2019 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Defendant's notice for presentment #3 set for 8/12/2019 is stricken and defendant is directed to re-notice its motion to dismiss #5 for a date the court has a motion call. Defendant is reminded to review the court's website regarding dates when the court is in session before filing any further motions and to bring a courtesy copy of the motion and notice to chambers immediately. Mailed notice (cn).
July 29, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant G4S Security Solutions (USA), Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
July 29, 2019 Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by G4S Security Solutions (USA), Inc. (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
July 29, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Motion by Kelly Elisabeth Eisenlohr-Moul for presentment of before Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 8/12/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
July 29, 2019 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant G4S Security Solutions (USA), Inc. by Kelly Elisabeth Eisenlohr-Moul (Eisenlohr-Moul, Kelly)
July 9, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard ramirez; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16006460. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fitz, Alycia)
July 9, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramirez vs. G4S Security Solutions (USA), Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mr. Richard ramirez
Represented By: Alycia Alexandra Fitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: G4S Security Solutions (USA), Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Ramirez
Represented By: Alycia Alexandra Fitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?