Sanders v. Chicago Transit Authority
| Shaneise Sanders |
| Chicago Transit Authority |
| 1:2019cv04656 |
| July 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Status hearing held. Defendant's answer or response (or both) to the complaint is due on 09/09/2019. Defendant will be filing, at least, a partial motion to dismiss the Section 1983 claim. Plaintiff's response to the partial motion to dismiss due 10/09/2019. Defendant's reply due 10/23/2019. The Court discussed how the Section 1983 claim might not materially impact the litigation in light of the Title VII claim and its fee-shifting provision (the compensatory damages cap, if any, might be the only difference). Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project disclosures due 10/09/2019 on the non-targeted claims. ESI discovery shall be disclosed by 11/18/2019. The first-round of written discovery requests must be issued no later than 10/31/2019. Fact discovery, including treating physicians (Rule 26(a)(2)(C) disclosures for any treaters are due no later than 90 days before the close of fact discovery), shall close by 02/14/2020. Any other Rule 26(a)(2) expert disclosures (whether retained or not) are due 30 days after the close of fact discovery, and the 30-day deadline is adjusted automatically if the close of fact discovery is adjusted. No summary judgment motions may be filed before the close of discovery without leave of Court. The parties may start issuing non-party subpoenas immediately, especially for medical records. The parties shall work promptly on an agreed HIPAA order and discovery confidentiality order. Plaintiff shall make a formal settlement demand by 09/20/2019 on Defendant, explaining in detail the basis for liability, itemizing damages, and making a good-faith demand that takes into account the risks of litigation, the time and expense of litigation. Defendant shall respond by 10/01/2019 to Plaintiff's demand, explaining in detail the basis for Defendant's offer and taking into account the same risks and costs of litigation. Defendant shall submit a.pdf copy of both the demand and the offer to chambers through the Proposed Order e-mail account. If the settlement demand and response generate momentum, the parties may file a motion to postpone the MID disclosures. Status hearing set for 10/24/2019 at 9 a.m. Emailed notice (slb, )
|
|
Filing 11
Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Parties' Joint Initial Status Report, filed by Defendant Chicago Transit Authority. (Gallardo, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 10
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Chicago Transit Authority by Peter Conrad McNamara (McNamara, Peter)
|
|
Filing 9
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Chicago Transit Authority by Kristina Marie Gregory (Gregory, Kristina)
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Chicago Transit Authority by Kevin R. Gallardo (Gallardo, Kevin)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE by Shaneise Sanders re waiver of service executed #6 (Willis, Jill)
|
|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Shaneise Sanders. All Defendants. (Willis, Jill)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial status hearing set for 09/03/2019 at 9:30 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, )
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ek, )
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (pj, )
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL Cover Sheet (Willis, Jill)
|
|
Filing 2
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Shaneise Sanders by Jill Michelle Willis (Willis, Jill)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Shaneise Sanders; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16017328. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Willis, Jill)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sanders v. Chicago Transit Authority | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Chicago Transit Authority | |
| Represented By: | Kevin R. Gallardo |
| Represented By: | Peter Conrad McNamara |
| Represented By: | Kristina Marie Gregory |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shaneise Sanders | |
| Represented By: | Jill Michelle Willis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
