Diebold v. Paylocity Corporation
| Katherine Diebold, Amanda Rieker, Shronda Armstrong, Erin O'Neill and Sarah Frankiewicz |
| Paylocity Corporation |
| 1:2019cv04716 |
| July 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Z Lee |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:In the joint status report, the parties request that the case be stayed pending a private mediation. That request is granted. This case is stayed and administratively closed subject to reinstatement. Plaintiff should file a status report once the parties have agreed on a date for the private mediation, and another status report within 3 days of its conclusion. The status hearing set for 9/10/19 is reset to 11/12/19 at 9:00 a.m.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Defendant Paylocity Corporation. (Mulherin, Joseph) |
| Filing 27 STATUS Report (Joint and Initial) by Shronda Armstrong, Katherine Diebold, Sarah Frankiewicz, Erin O'Neill, Amanda Rieker (Werman, Douglas) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) , filed by Plaintiffs Shronda Armstrong, Katherine Diebold, Sarah Frankiewicz, Erin O'Neill, Amanda Rieker. (Davis, Benjamin) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE by Amanda Rieker of Plaintiff Consent Filing (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Davis, Benjamin) |
| Filing 24 CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATION BY ATTORNEY REGARDING DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS UNDER MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY PILOT PROJECT (Burgy, Kelly) |
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATION BY ATTORNEY REGARDING DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS UNDER MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY PILOT PROJECT (Davis, Benjamin) |
| Filing 22 Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Katherine Diebold (Salas, Maureen) |
| Filing 21 Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project by Katherine Diebold (Werman, Douglas) |
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATION BY ATTORNEY REGARDING DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS UNDER MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY PILOT PROJECT (Mead, Brian) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE CERTIFICATION BY ATTORNEY REGARDING DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS UNDER MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY PILOT PROJECT (Mulherin, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Paylocity Corporation re answer to complaint #17 (Mulherin, Joseph) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint by Paylocity Corporation(Mulherin, Joseph) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE by Sarah Frankiewicz of Plaintiff Consent Filing (Davis, Benjamin) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Erin O'Neill of Plaintiff Consent Filing (Davis, Benjamin) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE by Shronda Armstrong of Plaintiff Consent Filing (Davis, Benjamin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE by Brian Alan Mead of Change of Address (Mead, Brian) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Paylocity Corporation by Brian Alan Mead (Mead, Brian) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Paylocity Corporation by Joseph Kevin Mulherin (Mulherin, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Benjamin Davis's and Kelly Burgy's motions for leave to appear pro hac vice #8 #9 are granted.Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16039713. (Burgy, Kelly) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16039618. (Davis, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Katherine Diebold as to Paylocity Corporation on 7/15/2019, answer due 8/5/2019. (Werman, Douglas) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Initial status hearing set for 9/10/19 at 9:00 a.m. Judge Lee participates in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project ("Project"). The Project applies to all cases filed on or after June 1, 2017, excluding the following: (1) cases exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B), (2) actions brought by a person in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision, regardless of whether an attorney is recruited, (3) actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, (4) patent cases governed by the Local Patent Rules, and (5) cases transferred for consolidated administration in the District by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("Exempt Cases").For all cases to which the Project applies, Judge Lee requires (1) each attorney appearing on behalf of Plaintiff(s) to file a "Certification by Attorney Regarding Discovery Obligations Under Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" form within 28 days after the filing of the Complaint and (2) each attorney appearing on behalf of Defendant(s) to file the certification form with the Answer. The parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing. The certification form and initial status report requirements are set forth in Judge Lee's standing order regarding the "Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" available on the Courts website. For all Exempt Cases, the parties are directed to file a joint initial status report four business days prior to the initial status hearing in accordance with the standing order governing "Initial Status Report in Cases Exempt from the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project" also available on the Court's website. Mailed notice (ca, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ek, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Paylocity Corporation. (mma, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Katherine Diebold by Maureen Ann Salas (Salas, Maureen) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Katherine Diebold by Douglas M. Werman (Werman, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by Katherine Diebold; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16026696.(Werman, Douglas) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Werman, Douglas) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Z. Lee. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
