Wahl Clipper Corporation v. Manscaped, LLC et al
| Wahl Clipper Corporation |
| Manscaped, Inc. and Manscaped, LLC |
| 1:2019cv04733 |
| July 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case referred to the Honorable Jeffrey Cole, pursuant to Local Rule 72.1. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/12/2019. (ph, ) |
| Filing 21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Status and motion hearing held on 9/12/2019. Based upon the representation of the parties this case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference. Defendant's motion to dismiss #12 is denied without prejudice. Status hearing set for 12/12/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in courtroom 1203. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: The Court is in receipt of Defendant's motion to dismiss #12 , which is noticed for presentment on 9/12/19. Plaintiff is advised to review the Court's standing order on Motions to Dismiss, which is available on the Court's homepage at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. The Court's Order requires Plaintiff to make an election as to whether it will amend its complaint or stand on the current complaint and proceed with briefing on the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff shall be prepared to make an election regarding Defendant's motion to dismiss at the 9/12/19 motion hearing. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 19 STATUS Report Parties by Wahl Clipper Corporation (Albers, Daniel) |
| Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Darren Quinn's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice #10 is granted. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 17 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Manscaped, LLC (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 16 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Manscaped, Inc. (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion by Yanling Jiang for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #12 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 9/12/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT by Manscaped, Inc., Manscaped, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1 - MANSCAPE _ definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary, #2 Exhibit Ex 2 - Manscape _ Definition of Manscape at Dictionary.com, #3 Exhibit Ex 3 - Urban Dictionary_ Manscape, #4 Exhibit Ex 4 - What does manscape mean_ manscape Definition. Meaning of manscape. OnlineSlangDictionary, #5 Exhibit Ex 5 - manscape - Wiktionary, #6 Exhibit Ex 6 - Manscaping _ Definition of Manscaping by Merriam-Webster, #7 Exhibit Ex 7 - Manscaping definition and meaning - Collins English Dictionary, #8 Exhibit Ex 8 - manscaping noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes _ Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary at OxfordLearnersDictionaries.com, #9 Exhibit Ex 9 - manscaper - Wiktionary, #10 Exhibit Ex 10 - Urban Dictionary_ Manscaper, #11 Exhibit Ex 11 - -er (suffix) definition and synonyms _ Macmillan Dictionary, #12 Exhibit Ex 12 - -er definition and meaning _ Collins English Dictionary, #13 Exhibit Ex 13 - -er - Wiktionary, #14 Exhibit Ex 14 - Er _ Definition of Er at Dictionary.com, #15 Exhibit Ex 15 - 76646327 - Manscaper - TESS, #16 Exhibit Ex 16 - 76646327 - Manscaper, #17 Exhibit Ex 17 - 77301196 - MANSCAPING - TESS, #18 Exhibit Ex 18 - 77301196 - MANSCAPING Office Action 2012-02-10, #19 Exhibit Ex 19 - 85597890 - MANSCAPES - TESS, #20 Exhibit Ex 20 - 85597890 - Office Action for Manscapes, #21 Exhibit Ex 21 - 85907759 - MANSCAPE - TESS, #22 Exhibit Ex 22 - 85907759 - MANSCAPE Priority Action, #23 Exhibit Ex 23 - 86393983 - MANSCAPES - TESS, #24 Exhibit Ex 24 - 86393983 - Office Action - Manscapes, #25 Exhibit Ex 25 - 86534628 - MANSCAPE - TESS, #26 Exhibit Ex 26 - 86534628 - MANSCAPE Office Action (Excerpts), #27 Exhibit Ex 27 - 86599092 - GIBS GUYS INTO BEARD STUFF MAN SCAPER BEARD, HAIR & TATTOO OIL - TESS, #28 Exhibit Ex 28 - 86599092 - GIBS GUYS INTO BEARD STUFF MAN SCAPER BEARD, HAIR & TATTOO OIL - Office Action, #29 Exhibit Ex 29 - 87786295 - MANSCAPED REFINING THE GENTLEMAN - TESS, #30 Exhibit Ex 30 - 87786295 - MANSCAPED REFINING THE GENTLEMAN, #31 Exhibit Ex 31 - 88447165 - MANSCAPED - TESS, #32 Exhibit Ex 32 - 88447165 - MANSCAPED - Office Action, #33 Exhibit Ex 33 - Search for Manscaper, #34 Exhibit Ex 34 - Trimmers Wahl USA)(Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM by Manscaped, Inc., Manscaped, LLC in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #12 (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Manscaped, Inc., Manscaped, LLC (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Manscaped, Inc., Manscaped, LLC by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16134984. (Quinn, Darren) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Monica Stover's motion for leave to proceed pro hac vice #7 is granted. Mailed notice. (cc, ) |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wahl Clipper Corporation by Erin Marie Pauley (Pauley, Erin) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16053475. (Stover, Monica) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP Standing Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 9/12/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 9/2/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 5 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (mma, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, ) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wahl Clipper Corporation by Grant Henry Peters (Peters, Grant) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Wahl Clipper Corporation by Daniel Paul Albers (Albers, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Wahl Clipper Corporation; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16029686. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Albers, Daniel) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Manscaped, Inc., Manscaped, LLC (lma, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
