Quadri v. Meijer
| Murtaza Quadri |
| Meijer |
| 1:2019cv04819 |
| July 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John J Tharp |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Joint NOTICE of Motion by Rachel Shaskos Urquhart for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #7 before Honorable John J. Tharp Jr. on 9/24/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Urquhart, Rachel) |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Defendant Meijer for extension of time to file answer to Complaint (Joint) (Urquhart, Rachel) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Meijer by Rachel Shaskos Urquhart (Urquhart, Rachel) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr:This case is set for an initial status conference on 10/1/19 at 9:00 a.m. The parties are directed to review the procedures for initial status conferences, located at [https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?79eF+7uiX7ewBj/ITKrjoA==], and to submit the required initial status report no later than 9/24/19. Mailed notice (air, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Murtaza Quadri as to Meijer on 8/27/2019, answer due 9/17/2019. (Memon, Kamran) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Meijer. (lw, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (jh, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Memon, Kamran) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Murtaza Quadri; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16042704.(Memon, Kamran) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Quadri v. Meijer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Murtaza Quadri | |
| Represented By: | Kamran A. Memon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Meijer | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Shaskos Urquhart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
