Nelson v. Polychem Corporation et al
| Timothy Nelson |
| Polychem Corporation, The Sterling Group and The Sterling Group, L.P. |
| 1:2019cv04980 |
| July 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Virginia M Kendall |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall: Case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice #23 . Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 23 STIPULATION of Dismissal Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (Educate, Michael) |
| Filing 22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Plaintiff's Motion for extension of time to file first amended Complaint as a matter of course in lieu of responding to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #20 is granted. Amended Complaint shall be filed by 9/9/2019. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss #11 is dismissed as moot and briefing schedule as set in Minute Entry #19 dated 8/20/2019. Motion hearing set for 8/26/2019 is stricken. Status hearing set for 10/8/2019 at 9:00 AM stands. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Motion by Michael David Richman for presentment of extension of time #20 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/26/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Richman, Michael) |
| Filing 20 MOTION by Plaintiff Timothy Nelson for extension of time (Richman, Michael) |
| Filing 19 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Briefing schedule set as to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #11 . Response due by 8/16/2019. Reply due by 8/23/2019. Status Hearing set for 10/8/2019 at 9:00 AM. Motion hearing set for 8/7/2019 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) |
| Filing 18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Timothy Nelson by Michael David Richman (Richman, Michael) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Timothy Nelson by Terrie Sullivan Terrie C. Sullivan (Sullivan, Terrie) |
| Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Timothy Nelson by Michael David Richman (Richman, Michael) |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Timothy Nelson by Jeffrey Charles Blumenthal (Blumenthal, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Timothy Nelson by Jeffrey Charles Blumenthal (Blumenthal, Jeffrey) (PDF not legible - Docket Text Modified by Clerks Office.) Modified on 8/1/2019 (bg, ). |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM by Polychem Corporation, The Sterling Group, L.P. in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #11 Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with Prejudice (with Hyperlinks) (Callahan, Nicholas) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with Prejudice NOTICE of Motion by Nicholas Heim Callahan for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #11 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/7/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Callahan, Nicholas) |
| Filing 11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Polychem Corporation, The Sterling Group, L.P. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with Prejudice (Callahan, Nicholas) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (bg, ) |
| Filing 9 MAILED Notice of Removal letter to counsel of record. (bg, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (yt) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by Polychem Corporation (Callahan, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by The Sterling Group (Callahan, Nicholas) |
| Filing 6 Polychem Corporation's Corporate Disclosure Statement STATEMENT by Polychem Corporation, The Sterling Group (Callahan, Nicholas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2019CH07536) filed by Polychem Corporation, The Sterling Group Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16067922. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Callahan, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Polychem Corporation, The Sterling Group by Michael D Educate (Educate, Michael) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Polychem Corporation, The Sterling Group by Nicholas Heim Callahan (Callahan, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Polychem Corporation, The Sterling Group by Nicholas Heim Callahan (Callahan, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Callahan, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
