Arjo Inc. v. Arjo-Century Distributing, Inc. et al
Arjo Inc. |
Arjo-Century Distributing, Inc. and Karman D. Cusack |
1:2019cv05000 |
July 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sara L Ellis |
Contract: Other |
9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 STATUS Report (Initial) by Arjo Inc. (Casto, Nicholas) |
![]() |
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Motion hearing held on 9/12/2019. Plaintiff's counsel appeared and Defendants failed to appear on Plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff's Rule 55(a) motion for entry of default on its petition to confirm arbitration award #11 is granted. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Nicholas Alan Casto for presentment of motion for entry of default #11 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 9/12/2019 at 01:45 PM. (Casto, Nicholas) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Plaintiff Arjo Inc. for entry of default on its Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Casto, Nicholas) |
Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 9/26/2019 at 1:30 PM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 9/19/2019. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Arjo Inc. regarding Arjo Inc.'s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award served on Karman D. Cusack on August 13, 2019 (Colunga, Isaac) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Arjo Inc. regarding Arjo Inc.'s Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award served on Arjo-Century Distributing, Inc. on August 13, 2019 (Colunga, Isaac) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Arjo-Century Distributing, Inc., Karman D. Cusack. (lw, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pj, ) |
Filing 6 PAYMENT of Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16075879. (Colunga, Isaac) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. FEE DUE, NO INFORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, ) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arjo Inc. by Riele Jaalise Sims (Sims, Riele) |
Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arjo Inc. by Nicholas Alan Casto (Casto, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arjo Inc. by Isaac J. Colunga (Colunga, Isaac) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Colunga, Isaac) |
Filing 1 PETITION to Confirm Arbitration Award (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Colunga, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.