Zata v. Boeing Co., The et al
Plaintiff: John Barasa Zata
Defendant: Boeing Co., The and Rosemount Aerospace, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv05103
Filed: July 29, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jorge L Alonso
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Airplane Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: The Court orders all individual related actions, 19 C 4964, 19 C 5079, 19 C 5098, 19 C 5102,19 C 5103, 19 C 5137, 19 C 5352, 19 C 5438, 19 C 5449, 19 C 5559, 19 C 5561, 19 C 5562, 19 C 5563, 19 C 5564, 19 C 5582, 19 C 5756, 19 C 5803, 19 C 5846 to be consolidated under case number l9 C 2170. This order will be implemented by the Clerk of Court submitting JS-6 forms to the Administrative Office for the individual related actions. This will designate the individual related actions as closed for administrative and statistical purposes. This order will not be considered a dismissal or disposition of these actions on the merits. All future pleadings are to be filed in the consolidated case alone (19 C 2170). No pleadings should be filed in any of the individual related actions which are to be administratively closed. Any additional related cases filed in the future and assigned to Judge Alonso will also be administratively closed and consolidated with this case. Should any party believe at any point in the future that separate proceedings have become necessary for that party's particular claims, the party should make a motion in the consolidated case 19 C 2170 seeking relief. The Clerk is also directed to transfer all attorney appearances in the individual related actions to 19 C 2170. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 9/16/2019. Mailed notice. (bg, )
September 16, 2019 CONSOLIDATED for all purposes. See docket 19cv2170 for all further entries. (bg, )
September 3, 2019 Filing 15 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: It appearing that the Hon. Jorge L. Alonso is presiding over 19 CV 2170, In re: Ethiopian Airlines Fight ET 302 Crash and the Hon. M. David Weisman as the designated magistrate judge; and It further appearing that the cases listed below are related to 19 CV 2170, In re: Ethiopian Airlines Fight ET 302 Crash pursuant to Local Rule 40.4; therefore It is hereby ordered that Judge Alonso shall be reassigned the cases listed below; and It is further ordered that Magistrate Judge Weisman shall be the designated magistrate judge in these cases. Case# Case Title 19 CV 4964 Lopez-Lewis v. The Boeing Company et al 19 CV 5079 Garg v. The Boeing Company 19 CV 5098 Nykvist et al v. Boeing Company Co., The 19 CV 5102 Chen v. Boeing Co., The 19 CV 5103 Zata v. Boeing Co., The et al 19 CV 5352 Kivia v. The Boeing Company 19 CV 5438 Mutua v. Boeing Company, The 19 CV 5449 Ramadhan et al v. The Boeing Company Case reassigned to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso for all further proceedings. Honorable John Robert Blakey no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/3/2019. (ph, )
August 22, 2019 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Boeing Co., The(Buck, Jonathan)
August 22, 2019 Filing 13 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Boeing Co., The (Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Buck, Jonathan)
August 22, 2019 Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Boeing Co., The by Jonathan R Buck (Buck, Jonathan)
August 14, 2019 Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant's agreed motion for extension of time to file answer #9 is granted. Any answer or other responsive pleading shall be filed on or before 9/21/2019. Initial status hearing previously set for 9/18/2019 is reset for 9/26/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. Motion hearing set for 9/10/2019 is stricken. Mailed notice (gel, )
August 14, 2019 Filing 10 Agreed NOTICE of Motion by Shane Brian Nichols for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #9 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 9/10/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Nichols, Shane)
August 14, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION by Defendant Rosemount Aerospace, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Agreed (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Compl.)(Nichols, Shane)
August 14, 2019 Filing 8 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Rosemount Aerospace, Inc. (Nichols, Shane)
August 14, 2019 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Rosemount Aerospace, Inc. by Shane Brian Nichols (Nichols, Shane)
August 6, 2019 Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP Standing Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 9/18/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 9/2/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, )
July 31, 2019 Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Barasa Zata by Brian LaCien (LaCien, Brian)
July 30, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, )
July 30, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, )
July 30, 2019 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Boeing Co., The, Rosemount Aerospace, Inc. (mc, )
July 29, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Barasa Zata by Todd A. Smith (Smith, Todd)
July 29, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, Todd)
July 29, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by John Barasa Zata; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16081994. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order Appointing Wrongful Death Special Administrator)(Smith, Todd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zata v. Boeing Co., The et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boeing Co., The
Represented By: Jonathan R Buck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosemount Aerospace, Inc.
Represented By: Shane Brian Nichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Barasa Zata
Represented By: Todd A. Smith
Represented By: Brian LaCien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?