Green v. Illinois State Board of Education et al
| Robert Green |
| Illinois State Board of Education, Michael Popp, Aurora East School District 131, Christopher Koch, Angela Brancato, Kim Grice and Bernard Weiler |
| 1:2019cv05181 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang:On review of the docket, the answer deadlines for Defendants Grice, Brancato, and Weiler are 10/02/2019 and 10/03/2019. If those Defendants wish to adopt any previously filed motion to dismiss, they may do so by filing a Position Paper that says so. The status hearing of 09/23/2019 is reset to 10/17/2019 at 10:15 a.m.. A joint status report is due by 10/11/2019. On the motions #20 #25 to dismiss of Defendants Illinois State Board of Education and Koch and Defendants Aurora School District and Popp, Plaintiff's ***combined*** response is due by 10/21/2019. The reply briefs are due by 11/04/2019. The motion #23 of Aurora School District and Popp to substitute attorney is granted. The motion #27 to seal is provisionally granted. The Court will again review the propriety of sealing when evaluating the underlying motion. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Motion by Michael D. Bersani for presentment of motion to substitute attorney #23 , motion to seal document #27 , motion to dismiss #25 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 9/23/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 27 MOTION by Defendants Aurora East School District 131, Michael Popp to seal document (Exhibits D & H of Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss) (Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 26 MEMORANDUM by Aurora East School District 131, Michael Popp in support of motion to dismiss #25 Plaintiff Robert Green's Amended Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 25 MOTION by Defendants Michael Popp, Aurora East School District 131 to dismiss (Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 31 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Bernard Weiler on 9/12/2019, answer due 10/3/2019. (jh, ) |
| Filing 30 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Angela Brancato on 9/11/2019, answer due 10/2/2019. (jh, ) |
| Filing 29 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Kim Grice on 9/11/2019, answer due 10/2/2019. (jh, ) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Motion by Michael D. Bersani for presentment of motion to substitute attorney #23 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 9/23/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 23 MOTION by Defendants Aurora East School District 131, Michael Popp to substitute attorney (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Bersani, Michael) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Motion by Michael D. Arnold for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #20 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 9/23/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Arnold, Michael) |
| Filing 21 MEMORANDUM by Illinois State Board of Education, Christopher Koch in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #20 (Arnold, Michael) |
| Filing 20 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendants Illinois State Board of Education, Christopher Koch (Arnold, Michael) |
| Filing 19 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Illinois State Board of Education, Christopher Koch by Michael D. Arnold (Arnold, Michael) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Aurora East School District 131 on 8/15/2019, answer due 9/5/2019. (jh, ) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Illinois State Board of Education on 8/20/2019, answer due 9/10/2019. (jh, ) |
| Filing 16 DOCUMENTS and EXHIBITS of Plaintiff Amended Complaint #13 . (jh, ) |
| Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Defendants Popp and School District 131 filed a motion #11 to dismiss Count 1, but then Plaintiff filed an amended complaint #13 . The Court treats the amended complaint as the one as-of-right amendment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). On that basis, the motion #11 to dismiss is terminated without prejudice. The currently served Defendants' answer or responsive motion is due by 09/18/2019. The status hearing of 09/23/2019 remains in place. The Court reminds Plaintiff to make service efforts. Plaintiff's motion #4 for attorney representation is denied without prejudice. At this pleading-stage of the case, Plaintiff should be able to represent himself competently. He has post-graduate education, R. 4 5, and the amended complaint alleges that he worked as a physical education and health teacher for over 20 years. If the case becomes more complex, then he may refile the motion at that time. Emailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Angela Brancato, Kim Grice, Bernard Weiler. (jh, ) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED Complaint by Robert Green. (jh, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Motion by Adam Dauksas for presentment of motion to dismiss #11 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 8/29/2019 at 08:30 AM. (Dauksas, Adam) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendants Michael Popp, Aurora East School District 131 to dismiss DEFENDANTS' RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Dauksas, Adam) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Aurora East School District 131, Michael Popp by John E. Fester (Fester, John) |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Aurora East School District 131, Michael Popp by Adam Dauksas (Dauksas, Adam) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Status hearing set for 09/23/2019 at 9 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (lma, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Aurora East School District 131, Illinois State Board of Education (lma, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Green for attorney representation (lma, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE Appearance by Plaintiff Robert Green (lma, ) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (lma, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Robert Green; (Exhibits) (lma, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
