Duric v. Williams et al
Nenad Duric |
Cecilval Williams and Schneider National Carriers Inc. |
1:2019cv05182 |
July 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sara L Ellis |
P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ELECTRONIC Acknowledgement of case transferred to the District of New Jersey [LIVE] as case 2:20-cv-01272, filed 02/06/2020. (kp, ) |
Filing 21 TRANSFERRED to the District of New Jersey the electronic record. (las, ) |
Filing 20 ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice(las, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER: The Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss or transfer venue to the District of New Jersey #9 . The Court directs the Clerk to transfer this case to the District of New Jersey pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406. See Statement. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 1/22/2020. Mailed notice(las, ) |
Filing 18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Status hearing held on 1/22/2020. The Court to issue its ruling on motion to transfer, shortly. Status hearing set for 2/12/2020 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court strikes ruling date set for 12/12/2019 and resets it to 1/22/2020 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 16 REPLY by Defendants Schneider National Carriers Inc., Cecilval Williams to motion to transfer case #9 Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss or to Transfer Venue to the District of New Jersey Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Milam, Kelly) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE by Plaintiff Nenad Duric to motion to transfer case #9 (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Treshansky, Jonathan) |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Schneider National Carriers Inc., Cecilval Williams by Jennifer Goelz (Goelz, Jennifer) |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nenad Duric by Gerald Jonathan Bekkerman (Bekkerman, Gerald) |
Filing 14 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Motion hearing held on 9/19/2019. Motion by Schneider National Carriers, Inc. for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead by October 4, 2019 #7 is granted. Briefing schedule as to motion to transfer case #9 : responses by 10/21/2019; replies by 11/12/2019. Status hearing set for 10/1/2019 is stricken and reset to 12/12/2019 at 1:30 PM for ruling on motion to transfer. All discovery stayed including MIDP pending ruling on motion to transfer. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 11 Certificate of Service and NOTICE of Motion by Kelly Virginia Milam for presentment of motion to transfer case #9 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 9/19/2019 at 01:45 PM. (Milam, Kelly) |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM by Schneider National Carriers Inc., Cecilval Williams in support of motion to transfer case #9 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Milam, Kelly) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Defendants Schneider National Carriers Inc., Cecilval Williams to transfer case (Milam, Kelly) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Motion by Kelly Virginia Milam for presentment of extension of time #7 before Honorable Sara L. Ellis on 9/17/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Milam, Kelly) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Defendants Schneider National Carriers Inc., Cecilval Williams for extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Milam, Kelly) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Schneider National Carriers Inc., Cecilval Williams by Kelly Virginia Milam (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Milam, Kelly) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Nenad Duric regarding Summons and Complaint served on Schneider National Carriers, Inc on 08/14/2019 (Attachments: #1 Notice of Filing)(Bekkerman, Gerald) |
Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 10/1/2019 at 9:30 AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 9/24/2019. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Schneider National Carriers Inc., Cecilval Williams (mc, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nenad Duric by Jonathan D Treshansky (Treshansky, Jonathan) |
Filing 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (las, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nenad Duric ; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16091886. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Treshansky, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.