MOBILE NOW, Inc. v. Brightstar US, LLC
Plaintiff: MOBILE NOW, Inc.
Defendant: Brightstar US, LLC f/k/a Brightstar US, Inc. and Brightstar US, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv05241
Filed: August 2, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Jorge L Alonso
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Rule26(f) Initial Status Report by MOBILE NOW, Inc. PARTIES' JOINT INITIAL STATUS REPORT (Sanders, James)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16269295. (Gerstein, John)
September 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16269208. (Richeimer, Gabriela)
September 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STATEMENT by MOBILE NOW, Inc. Plaintiff's Supplemental Statement of Federal Jurisdiction (Sanders, James)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 AMENDED complaint by MOBILE NOW, Inc. against Brightstar US, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Sanders, James)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16250176. (Roldan Cora, Javier)
September 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Brightstar US, LLC (Moore, Abram)
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Plaintiff is given until September 20, 2019 to file a supplemental statement of federal jurisdiction properly alleging a basis for this Court's jurisdiction. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 9/13/2019. Notice mailed by judge's staff (lf, )
September 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number 0752-16231248. (Kucera, Jeffrey)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Arbitration Proceedings and to Litigate Disputes Between the Parties (Moore, Abram)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Brightstar US, LLC by Abram Isaac Moore (Moore, Abram)
August 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Initial status hearing set for 10/2/19 at 9:30 a.m. Parties shall review and comply with Judge Alonso's Standing Order on The Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project on his website. Notice mailed by judge's staff (lf, )
August 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (gcy, )
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff MOBILE NOW, Inc. by Meghan Carney Dalton (Dalton, Meghan)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by MOBILE NOW, Inc. (Sanders, James)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff MOBILE NOW, Inc. by James J Sanders (Sanders, James)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Sanders, James)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by MOBILE NOW, Inc.; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16099927. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Sanders, James)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MOBILE NOW, Inc. v. Brightstar US, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brightstar US, LLC f/k/a Brightstar US, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brightstar US, LLC
Represented By: Abram Isaac Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MOBILE NOW, Inc.
Represented By: James J Sanders
Represented By: Meghan Carney Dalton
Represented By: John R. Gerstein
Represented By: Gabriela Richeimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?