Kulichkov et al v. Barr et al
| Alexadr Kulichkov and Yuliua Lavysh |
| Thomas CHIOPPA, Attorney General William Barr, Kevin K. McAleenan, US Attorney's Office, General William Barr and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 1:2019cv05293 |
| August 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Edmond E Chang |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Plaintiffs' motion #8 to voluntarily dismiss is granted. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the case is dismissed without prejudice. Status hearing of 09/24/2019 is vacated. Civil case terminated.Emailed notice (slb, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Plaintiffs Alexadr Kulichkov, Yuliua Lavysh to dismiss (Newcomb, Brent) |
| Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Elizabeth Inez Treacy as U.S. Attorney for Defendants William Barr, Thomas Chioppa, Kevin K. McAleenan, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (Treacy, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 DESIGNATION of Craig Arthur Oswald as U.S. Attorney for Defendants William Barr, Thomas Chioppa, Kevin K. McAleenan, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (Oswald, Craig) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Status hearing set for 09/24/2019 at 9 a.m. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements at least 3 business days before the initial status hearing. Plaintiff must still file the report even if not all Defendants have been served or have responded to requests to craft a joint report. read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel must read them anew even if counsel has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases.Emailed notice (Attachments: #1 Status Report Requirements) (slb, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (pk, ) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Newcomb, Brent) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Alexadr Kulichkov, Yuliua Lavysh by Brent Kelly Newcomb (Newcomb, Brent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Alexadr Kulichkov, Yuliua Lavysh; n. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16107441.(Newcomb, Brent) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (ec, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to William Barr, Thomas CHIOPPA, Kevin K. McAleenan and US Attorney's Office. (mc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
