Ali v. eTechnologies, Inc.
Plaintiff: Arshad Ali
Defendant: ETECHNOLOGIES, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv05546
Filed: August 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Charles P Kocoras
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2019 Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant eTechnologies, Inc. by Christina Jaremus (Jaremus, Christina)
October 8, 2019 Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant eTechnologies, Inc. by Clifford Raymond Perry, III (Perry, Clifford)
October 7, 2019 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Arshad Ali. eTechnologies, Inc. waiver sent on 10/1/2019, answer due 12/2/2019. (Fox, Edward)
August 21, 2019 Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Status hearing set for 10/15/2019 at 9:30 AM. At the initial hearing, parties to report on the following: 1. Possibility of settlement. 2. If no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary to prepare the case for resolution. Lead counsel for each party is required to attend the initial hearing. Failure to appear at any scheduled court hearing may result in the dismissal of claims for want of prosecution. Pursuant to Local Rule 5.3(a)(1), service of motions and notice of motions must be accomplished no later than 4:00 p.m. of the third business day preceding the date of presentment. This includes delivering a hard copy of the motion and notice of motion to Courtroom Deputy, Vettina Franklin at room 1744B no later than 4:00 p.m. the day of filing. Failure to comply may result in the striking of the matter from the Court's motion call. The Court requires hard copies of all documents be submitted to Courtroom Deputy, Vettina Franklin at room 1744B the same day of filing. Failure to comply may result in the striking of the document from the record. The Court directs counsel's attention to its Motion Schedule and Case Management Procedures located at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff is directed to advise all other parties of the Court's action herein. Mailed notice (vcf, )
August 16, 2019 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arshad Ali by Edward M. Fox (Fox, Edward)
August 16, 2019 Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Arshad Ali by Garrett W. Browne (Browne, Garrett)
August 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Arshad Ali; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16145971. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Browne, Garrett)
August 16, 2019 CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jjr, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ali v. eTechnologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arshad Ali
Represented By: Edward M. Fox
Represented By: Garrett W. Browne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ETECHNOLOGIES, Inc.
Represented By: Christina Jaremus
Represented By: Clifford Raymond Perry, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?