Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Mum Parking Inc. et al
Atain Specialty Insurance Company |
Seven West Division, Inc. and Mum Parking Inc. |
1:2019cv05558 |
August 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Sara L Ellis |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 STATUS Report by Atain Specialty Insurance Company (Blum, Christopher) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Atain Specialty Insurance Company as to Atain Specialty Insurance Company on 10/1/2019, answer due 10/22/2019. (Blum, Christopher) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Mum Parking Inc. (mc, ) |
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Atain Specialty Insurance Company. Seven West Division, Inc. waiver sent on 8/23/2019, answer due 10/22/2019. (Brown, David) |
Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The initial status conference in this matter is set for 10/22/2019 at 9:30 AM. The parties are directed to review the procedures and requirements for this conference on Judge Ellis' web site and to submit the required Initial Status Report by 10/15/2019. Mailed notice (rj, ) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (cc, ) |
Filing 10 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Atain Specialty Insurance Company (Blum, Christopher) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Atain Specialty Insurance Company by David Thomas Brown (Brown, David) |
Filing 8 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Atain Specialty Insurance Company Exhibit E regarding complaint, #1 (Blum, Christopher) |
Filing 7 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Atain Specialty Insurance Company Exhibit D regarding complaint, #1 (Blum, Christopher) |
Filing 6 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Atain Specialty Insurance Company Exhibit C regarding complaint, #1 (Blum, Christopher) |
Filing 5 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Atain Specialty Insurance Company Exhibit B regarding complaint, #1 (Blum, Christopher) |
Filing 4 EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Atain Specialty Insurance Company Exhibit A regarding complaint, #1 (Blum, Christopher) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Atain Specialty Insurance Company by Christopher Del Blum (Blum, Christopher) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Blum, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment filed by Atain Specialty Insurance Company; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16148397. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Martinez Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - ATPC, #3 Exhibit C - Indictment, #4 Exhibit D - Disposition Sheet, #5 Exhibit E - Policy)(Blum, Christopher) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sara L. Ellis. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.