Padula et al v. Servis One, Inc.
Kathleen V. Padula and James R. Padula |
Servis One, Inc. |
1:2019cv05567 |
August 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(B)(6) and incorporated memorandum of law #10 is entered and continued for reasons stated. Motion hearing held on 9/25/2019. Status hearing set for 10/24/2019 at 9:00 a.m. to stand. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
Filing 12 Amended NOTICE of Motion by Ryan Aaron Sawyer for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #10 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 9/25/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Sawyer, Ryan) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by Ryan Aaron Sawyer for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, #10 before Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 9/25/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Sawyer, Ryan) |
Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Servis One, Inc. and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Attachments: #1 Exhibit BK Petition, #2 Exhibit Modified Plan, #3 Exhibit Order Confirming Plan, #4 Exhibit Agreed Repayment Plan, #5 Exhibit Motion for Relief from Stay, #6 Exhibit Order Granting Relief from Stay)(Sawyer, Ryan) |
Filing 9 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Servis One, Inc. (Sawyer, Ryan) |
Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Servis One, Inc. by Douglas R Sargent (Sargent, Douglas) |
Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Servis One, Inc. by Ryan Aaron Sawyer (Sawyer, Ryan) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James R. Padula, Kathleen V. Padula as to Servis One, Inc. on 8/26/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. (Davidson, Joseph) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Joint status report due by 10/21/2019. Status hearing set for 10/24/2019 at 09:00 AM. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/27/2019:Mailed notice(srn, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (nsf, ) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs James R. Padula, Kathleen V. Padula by Mohammed Omar Badwan (Badwan, Mohammed) |
Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs James R. Padula, Kathleen V. Padula by Joseph Scott Davidson (Davidson, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by James R. Padula, Kathleen V. Padula; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16148900. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davidson, Joseph) |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Servis One, Inc. (lw, ) |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey Cole. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.