Price v. Ear Hustle 411 LLC
| Brian Price |
| Ear Hustle 411 LLC |
| 1:2019cv05597 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Robert W Gettleman |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brian Price by Yanling Jiang (Jiang, Yanling) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Plaintiff's motion for continuance #6 is granted. Status hearing set for 10/8/2019 is stricken and reset to 11/7/2019 at 9:00 a.m. The court notes that plaintiff has not followed the courts standing order by failing to bring a courtesy copy of the complaint to chambers and failing to notice his motion for presentment and bring courtesy copies of the motion and notice to chambers. Plaintiff is directed to bring a courtesy copy of the complaint to chambers immediately and to follow all other procedures set forth in the attached standing order. Mailed notice (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (cn). |
| Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Brian Price to continue Status Conference (Liebowitz, Richard) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Status hearing set for 10/8/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (cn). |
| Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: The Executive Committee, which administers the bar of this Court, notes the following: on August 8, 2019, attorney Richard Liebowitz applied for a pro hac vice efiling account in this Court. After obtaining the account, Mr. Liebowitz used the account to file the first of 12 cases electronically. In each of the cases, the filing fee was paid, but neither appearance forms nor pro hac vice petitions were filed. Local Rule 83.14; 83.16. For now, the Executive Committee posts this entry for the information and potential action of the assigned district judges in each case. Mailed notice. (sm, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Price as to Ear Hustle 411 LLC on 8/25/2019, answer due 9/16/2019. (Liebowitz, Richard) |
| Filing 2 MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC (pj, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Brian Price; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16152258. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Copyright Form)(Liebowitz, Richard) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. Case assignment: Random assignment. (acm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Price v. Ear Hustle 411 LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brian Price | |
| Represented By: | Richard P. Liebowitz |
| Represented By: | Yanling Jiang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ear Hustle 411 LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
