Dandridge v. Hudson
Delmond Maurice Dandridge, Jr |
D. Hudson, AUSP Thomson and Donald Hudson |
1:2019cv05634 |
August 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Thomas M Durkin |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 LETTER from Delmond Dandridge (Envelope postmarked 10/10/2019; Institutional postmark 10/10/2019). (sxb, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Petitioner is given until October 7, 2019 to either pay the $5 filing fee or file a petition for leave to file in forma pauperis. Petitioner is warned that the Court may dismiss this case if he fails to comply with this order. The Clerk is instructed to (1) update the docket to reflect that Respondent is Donald Hudson, Warden, AUSP Thomson; and, (2) send Petitioner a blank in forma pauperis application form. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 9/16/2019. Mailed notice. (sxb, ) |
MAILED a blank in forma pauperis application form and a copy of the order dated 9/16/2019 #4 to plaintiff Delmond Maurice Dandridge, Jr (sxb, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION by Petitioner Delmond Maurice Dandridge, Jr for injunction relief (sxb, ) |
Filing 2 PRISONER CIVIL Cover Sheet (sxb, ) |
Filing 1 RECEIVED PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Delmond Maurice Dandridge, Jr against AUSP Thomson, D. Hudson (Attachments: #1 Envelope not postmarked)(sxb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.