Pekin Life Insurance Company v. Olena et al
| Pekin Life Insurance Company |
| Crain Funeral Home & Cremation Service, Kimberly Olena and Tammy Woodworth |
| 1:2019cv05645 |
| August 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pekin Life Insurance Company by Robert Marc Chemers (Chemers, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Interpleader filed by Pekin Life Insurance Company; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16161777. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Life Insurance Policy), #2 Exhibit B (Request to Change Beneficiary Form - Kimberly and Tammy as beneficiaries)), #3 Exhibit C (Pekin letter to Insured), #4 Exhibit D (Req to Change Beneficiary Form - Tammy Woodworth as sole beneficiary), #5 Exhibit E (7-11-19 Pekin Letter to Insured), #6 Exhibit F (Assignment), #7 Exhibit G (Certificate of Death), #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chemers, Robert) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Crain Funeral Home & Cremation Service, Kimberly Olena, Tammy Woodworth (mc, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
