Rushing v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
| Mr. Joshua C Rushing |
| Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc and Trans Union LLC |
| 1:2019cv05702 |
| August 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Young B. Kim. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Joshua C Rushing by Richard Joseph Doherty (Doherty, Richard) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Joshua C Rushing by James Michael Smith (Smith, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Smith, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joshua C Rushing; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16172203. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Joshua Rushing, #2 Exhibit B - dispute letter to Equifax, #3 Exhibit C - dispute letter to Experian, #4 Exhibit D - dispute letter to Trans Union, #5 Exhibit E - 2nd dispute letter to Equifax, #6 Exhibit F - 2nd dispute letter to Experian, #7 Exhibit G - 2nd dispute letter to Trans Union)(Smith, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
