ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV et al v. Nazaha, Inc. et al
| ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV and Sream, Inc |
| Nazaha, Inc. and Mohammed K Zaman |
| 1:2019cv05871 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Joan H Lefkow |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Mohammed K Zaman (kl, ) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow: Initial status hearing is set for 11/5/2019 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ags, ) |
| Filing 4 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (gcy, ) |
| Filing 3 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (gcy, ) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan H. Lefkow. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jn, ) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV, Sream, Inc by Christopher V. Langone (Langone, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV, Sream, Inc; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16194422. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. USPTO- Notice of Recordation of Assignment, #2 Exhibit B. RooR Trademark Registrations, #3 Exhibit C. License Agreement, #4 Exhibit D. Agreement Scream Roor international, #5 Exhibit E. Product Purchase from Defendant, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Langone, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
