Taylor v. Professional Security Consultants, Inc.
Plaintiff: Richard Taylor
Defendant: Professional Security Consultants, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2019cv05918
Filed: September 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Kendall
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Preliminary settlement discussion held. In-person settlement conference set for 11/5/19 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 1858 stands. Mailed notice (lxs, )
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Briefing schedule set as to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #13 . Response due by 11/5/2019. Reply due by 11/12/2019. Status hearing set for 1/14/2020 at 9:00 AM. Initial Status hearing set for 11/21/2019 at 9:00 AM stands. Motion hearing set for 10/24/2019 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, )
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Professional Security Consultants, Inc.(Puklin, Bradley)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE of Motion by Bradley Edward Puklin for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim #13 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/24/2019 at 09:00 AM. (Puklin, Bradley)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Professional Security Consultants, Inc. to Dismiss Counts III and IV of Plaintiff's Complaint at Law (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Puklin, Bradley)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Professional Security Consultants' ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Professional Security Consultants, Inc.(Puklin, Bradley)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Status hearing held. In-person settlement conference is set for 11/5/2019 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff's settlement letter is due by 10/18/2019. Defendant's settlement letter is due by 10/28/2019. Preliminary settlement discussion with lead counsel only is set for 10/31/2019 at 10:30 a.m. by telephone. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the call to Defendant's counsel and jointly contact chambers (312) 435-3000. Parties are reminded that Judge Harjani requires compliance with his Standing Order for Settlement Conference, which is available on the Court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. Mailed notice (lxs, )
September 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: This case has been referred to Judge Harjani to conduct a settlement conference. Initial status hearing is set for 10/8/2019 at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom 1858 to set a settlement conference. Mailed notice (lxs, )
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case referred to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani for settlement conference pursuant to IOP 19. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/27/2019.(jjr, )
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendant's Motion for extension of time to answer #5 is granted. Answer shall be filed by 10/18/2019. Case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Harjani for the purpose of a settlement conference. Parties are directed to contact the courtroom deputy for Judge Harjani to schedule settlement conference. Motion hearing set for 10/3/2019 is stricken.Mailed notice (lk, )
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Professional Security Consultants, Inc. by Thomas William Cushing (Cushing, Thomas)
September 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion by Bradley Edward Puklin for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer #5 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/3/2019 at 09:30 AM. (Puklin, Bradley)
September 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION by Defendant Professional Security Consultants, Inc. for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead and motion to schedule settlement conference (Puklin, Bradley)
September 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 11/21/2019 at 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 11/18/2019. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (lk, )
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Professional Security Consultants, Inc. by Bradley Edward Puklin (Puklin, Bradley)
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Professional Security Consultants, Inc. (mc, )
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (ph, )
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Richard Taylor; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16202391. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Norman Washington, Maudia)
September 4, 2019 Opinion or Order CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Professional Security Consultants, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Professional Security Consultants, Inc.
Represented By: Bradley Edward Puklin
Represented By: Thomas William Cushing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Taylor
Represented By: Maudia Diana Victorian Norman Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?