Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. v. Xspire Pharma, LLC et al
| Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. |
| Xspire Pharma, LLC, John Does 1-10, Gentex Pharma, LLC and Ford Mundy |
| 1:2019cv05919 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| John Robert Blakey |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Defendant's unopposed motion to extend #18 is granted. Defendant's answer or other responsive pleading shall be filed on or before 12/9/19. The 10/22/19 notice of motion date is stricken, and the parties need not appear. In addition, the initial status conference previously set for 10/17/19 is hereby stricken and reset for 12/19/19 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. The parties must file a status report no later than 12/12/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Any failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Motion by John C. Ochoa for presentment of extension of time #18 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 10/22/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Ochoa, John) |
| Filing 18 MOTION by Defendant Xspire Pharma, LLC for extension of time to File Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [UNOPPOSED] (Ochoa, John) |
| Filing 17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Xspire Pharma, LLC by John C. Ochoa (Ochoa, John) |
| Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Xspire Pharma, LLC by Eric L. Samore (Samore, Eric) |
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc.. Gentex Pharma, LLC waiver sent on 10/15/2019, answer due 12/16/2019. (Clark, Dulijaza) |
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc.. Ford Mundy waiver sent on 10/15/2019, answer due 12/16/2019. (Clark, Dulijaza) |
| Filing 13 First AMENDED complaint by Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. against All Defendants (Edelman, Daniel) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Gentex Pharma, LLC, Ford Mundy (jg, ) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file amended complaint #10 is granted. Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint as a new docket entry. The 10/10/19 notice of motion date is stricken, and the parties need not appear. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Motion by Dulijaza Clark for presentment of motion for leave to file #10 before Honorable John Robert Blakey on 10/10/2019 at 09:45 AM. (Clark, Dulijaza) |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Plaintiff Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. for leave to file First Amended Complaint Adding Additional Complaint (Attachments: #1 Appendix Appendix A- Amended Complaint)(Clark, Dulijaza) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. as to Xspire Pharma, LLC on 9/16/2019, answer due 10/7/2019. (Clark, Dulijaza) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Pursuant to General Order 17-0005, this case falls within the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Project, and the "Standing Order in MIDP Cases" now governs the conduct of the litigants in this matter. Under the MIDP, this Court shall enforce the MIDP Standing Order via the Court's inherent authority (including the contempt of court power) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Consequently, both the parties and their attorneys are hereby ordered to review and fully comply with the MIDP Standing Order, which is available on the Court's homepage: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/MIDP Standing Order.pdf. The parties are further advised that in light of the MIDP's intended goal of reducing the traditional cost and delay of federal civil litigation, this Court will not grant routine motions for extensions of time to meet the deadlines imposed by the MIDP Standing Order (even agreed motions made jointly by the parties). During the course of the litigation, the attorneys must also appear at all hearing dates set by the Court or noticed by the parties. If an attorney has a conflict with a set court date, the attorney must notify Judge Blakey's Courtroom Deputy, Gloria Lewis, at (312)818-6699. If appropriate, the Court will then reset the matter. Advising opposing counsel of a scheduling conflict is not a substitute for communicating directly with the Court. The litigants are further ordered to review and fully comply with all of this Court's own standing orders, which are available on Judge Blakey's information page on the Courts official website: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. An initial status conference is hereby set for 10/17/2019 at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 1203. At the status conference, the Court will discuss the MIDP and ask the parties questions to verify that they have reviewed and complied with the MIDP Standing Order. Without exception, the parties must also file a status report no later than 10/7/2019, using the model template set forth in this Court's standing order regarding Initial (or Reassignment) Status Conferences. Failure by any party to file the status report by the requisite deadline (either jointly or, if necessary, individually with an explanation as to why a joint report could not be filed) may result in a summary dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute, or an entry of default against any served defendant(s) failing to comply with this order. Mailed notice (gel, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Xspire Pharma, LLC (yt) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP). The key features and deadlines are set forth in this Notice which includes a link to the (MIDP) Standing Order and a Checklist for use by the parties. In cases subject to the pilot, all parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the Standing Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the Standing Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the following documents (Notice of Mandatory Initial Discovery and the Standing Order) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (mma, ) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure STATEMENT by Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. (Clark, Dulijaza) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. by Cathleen M. Combs (Combs, Cathleen) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. by Dulijaza Clark (Clark, Dulijaza) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. by Daniel A. Edelman (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc.; Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-16202432.(Edelman, Daniel) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Susan E. Cox. Case assignment: Random assignment. (td, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
